[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-87?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SSHD-87.
-
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.3.0)
Resolution: Not A Problem
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now
wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting forever that
magically the release gets out of the box.
My opinion is that the
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0
Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as well :-)
/niklas
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet gno...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version
Hi,
as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I should
have added the revision and uploaded binaries for the vote. So I started
to generate them, and now, on my Mac, I have one error :
---
Test
Le Mon, 31 May 2010 09:18:24 +0200,
Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com a écrit :
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny
elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
[X] +1 Yes, release MINA 2.0
Assuming we will actually get a vote for the actual release as
well :-)
/niklas
+1, as soon
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm now
wondering if we should not release 2.0, instead of waiting
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com wrote:
as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I should have
added the revision and uploaded binaries for the vote. So I started to
generate them, and now, on my Mac, I have one error :
Do you get
I am getting the same error :(
Me and Emm both are on JDK 1.6 u20
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.com
wrote:
as I just launched a new vote for 2.0, as suggested by Niklas, I
There was a vulnerability discovered in TLS recently.
One fix is to switch off renegotitation.
Maybe you are running into this issue, but you'd have to check for yourself.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security :
A vulnerability of the renegotiation procedure was discovered
On 5/31/10 10:51 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
There was a vulnerability discovered in TLS recently.
One fix is to switch off renegotitation.
Maybe you are running into this issue, but you'd have to check for yourself.
Most certainly the case. The test fails in a call to
Hi guys,
I will hold the vote for a bit, just for me to generate the packages. It
will be done after lunch.
In any case, the 72 hours will start *after* the packages will have been
provided.
Sorry for the latency.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Hi guys,
I'm trying to package the 2.0 jars, following this page :
http://mina.apache.org/developer-guide.html#DeveloperGuide-ReleasingaPointRelease%2528CommittersOnly%2529
It's totally FU. When I run a mvn -Dwith-LGPL-dependencies -DdryRun=true
release:prepare (or even the mvn
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/24/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/21/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/24/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/21/changes
Hi Emmanuel,
It seems to me that the dependency link between several projects is wrong as
they are not referring to the correct packaging type ('jar' is inherited as
default packaging type, instead of 'bundle' in your case).
The attached patch should fix all dependency link issues and should
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/25/
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/25/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/26/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/23/
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/changes
Hi guys,
I don't know how possibly we were able to release MINA in the past, but
I must admit it's a nightmare. I spent the full afternoon trying to get
the packages generated and the 2.0.0 tags to be created, with no success.
Not only the poms were all totally broken (with bad references to
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.5-windows/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/org.apache.mina$mina-core/changes
See
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/MINA-trunk-jdk1.6-windows/changes
+1
Jeff
On May 31, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
+1
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 09:11, Emmanuel Lecharny elecha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi guys,
we blocked a release a few weeks ago, because some test was failing on
windows. Maarten has provided a working version of this test, I'm
31 matches
Mail list logo
