The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day.Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues.I'm working on to fix it now.Cagatay
On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
continuum test to a special time,when this test passes.try tomorrow
Hi All,
I need Command Button Target to be set to the different frame, which can
be done easily using the commandLink target attribute.
Is there any other way to set the target on commandButton.
Thanks,
Girish
**
This
And how are we going to handle the vote? I think we should tag and
build it as 1.1.4, run the TCK, then vote. Other opinions? (The
guidelines on the wiki may need to be revised.)
So the plan is:
1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo
2.) Vote
3.) Manually copy to the ibiblio sync dirs?
And we do
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-506?page=comments#action_12426575
]
Dan commented on TOMAHAWK-506:
---
is this patch gonna be applied? it's been a month now.
Schedule getClickedTime() returns incorrect time in compact views
On 8/8/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how are we going to handle the vote? I think we should tag and
build it as 1.1.4, run the TCK, then vote. Other opinions? (The
guidelines on the wiki may need to be revised.)
So the plan is:
1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo
2.) Vote
cool
On 8/8/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day.
Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues.
I'm working on to fix it now.
Cagatay
On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-506?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust updated TOMAHAWK-506:
-
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied. Sorry for the delay, vacation got
On 8/8/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo
2.) Vote
3.) Manually copy to the ibiblio sync dirs?
1) could be either m2-snapshot-repository, or the myfaces repo on the zone.
myfaces repo is fine for me
1.5) Run the TCK one last time on the exact
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-513?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-513.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT
1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Invalid
The schedule was only added to tomahawk after the release of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-576?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-576.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT
1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Duplicate
this is a duplicate of TOMAHAWK-506
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-525?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-525.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
Refactor of DefaultScheduleEntryRenderer
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-541?page=all ]
Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-541.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
Resolution: Fixed
Tomahawk TLD error
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-541
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-53?page=comments#action_12426622
]
Gilliard Santos Cordeiro commented on TOMAHAWK-53:
--
I added manually input type=hidden name=jscook_action / in may page and
JSCoockMenu work
multiple resource schedule component with a custom entry renderer for travel
time
-
Key: TOMAHAWK-586
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-586
Project:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-53?page=comments#action_12426624
]
Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-53:
---
The wiki is probably out of date. I've updated it based on the information
you've provided, but since I
+1 Dennis ? :)
Yeah, I can do it if the jars are ready w/in ten hours. If not, it'll be
another 24 hours.
Dennis Byrne
3) Yes, with the caveat that there is no easy way to 'promote' an
artifact from the snapshot to the ibiblio-rsync repo. You can't just
copy files over, since Maven
Using the datascroller to go to a different page causes this to null out.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28TOMAHAWK-251%29-previousRowDataVar-is-not-saved-restored-tf1444681.html#a5711527
Sent from the My Faces - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
After Core 1.1.4 is done, should we delete the tomahawk branch that
was created on June 21st, and re-copy it from the 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT
trunk?
I think there have been several changes on the trunk that ought to be
in the next release, and it's probably easier to start over.
Which brings up another
Since my opinion on the matter has been misinterpreted previously, let
me try to restate it here.
After a branch, all changes should be made to the trunk.
If a branch has a major-priority error that has been fixed in trunk,
it should be merged back to the branch (and ideally, a new minor
branch
On 8/8/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a branch, all changes should be made to the trunk.
If a branch has a major-priority error that has been fixed in trunk,
it should be merged back to the branch (and ideally, a new minor
branch release would be made 1.1.major.minor).
20 matches
Mail list logo