Re: Tomahawk test failure

2006-08-08 Thread Cagatay Civici
The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day.Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues.I'm working on to fix it now.Cagatay On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: continuum test to a special time,when this test passes.try tomorrow

Command Button Target

2006-08-08 Thread Kumar, Girish
Hi All, I need Command Button Target to be set to the different frame, which can be done easily using the commandLink target attribute. Is there any other way to set the target on commandButton. Thanks, Girish ** This

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-08 Thread Sean Schofield
And how are we going to handle the vote? I think we should tag and build it as 1.1.4, run the TCK, then vote. Other opinions? (The guidelines on the wiki may need to be revised.) So the plan is: 1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo 2.) Vote 3.) Manually copy to the ibiblio sync dirs? And we do

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-506) Schedule getClickedTime() returns incorrect time in compact views

2006-08-08 Thread Dan (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-506?page=comments#action_12426575 ] Dan commented on TOMAHAWK-506: --- is this patch gonna be applied? it's been a month now. Schedule getClickedTime() returns incorrect time in compact views

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/8/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And how are we going to handle the vote? I think we should tag and build it as 1.1.4, run the TCK, then vote. Other opinions? (The guidelines on the wiki may need to be revised.) So the plan is: 1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo 2.) Vote

Re: Tomahawk test failure

2006-08-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
cool On 8/8/06, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The test has some daylight problems, failure/success changes during the day. Mario has made some changes but seems the problem continues. I'm working on to fix it now. Cagatay On 8/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-506) Schedule getClickedTime() returns incorrect time in compact views

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-506?page=all ] Jurgen Lust updated TOMAHAWK-506: - Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed Patch applied. Sorry for the delay, vacation got

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 8/8/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.) Deploy to the snapshot repo 2.) Vote 3.) Manually copy to the ibiblio sync dirs? 1) could be either m2-snapshot-repository, or the myfaces repo on the zone. myfaces repo is fine for me 1.5) Run the TCK one last time on the exact

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-513) Schedule missing from Tomahawk

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-513?page=all ] Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-513. -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Invalid The schedule was only added to tomahawk after the release of

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-576) getLastClickedDateAndTime doesn't work in Month view

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-576?page=all ] Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-576. -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Duplicate this is a duplicate of TOMAHAWK-506

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-525) Refactor of DefaultScheduleEntryRenderer

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-525?page=all ] Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-525. -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed Refactor of DefaultScheduleEntryRenderer

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-541) Tomahawk TLD error

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-541?page=all ] Jurgen Lust resolved TOMAHAWK-541. -- Fix Version/s: 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed Tomahawk TLD error -- Key: TOMAHAWK-541 URL:

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-53) Problem with JSCookMenu and SUN's RI

2006-08-08 Thread Gilliard Santos Cordeiro (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-53?page=comments#action_12426622 ] Gilliard Santos Cordeiro commented on TOMAHAWK-53: -- I added manually input type=hidden name=jscook_action / in may page and JSCoockMenu work

[jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-586) multiple resource schedule component with a custom entry renderer for travel time

2006-08-08 Thread Jurgen Lust (JIRA)
multiple resource schedule component with a custom entry renderer for travel time - Key: TOMAHAWK-586 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-586 Project:

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-53) Problem with JSCookMenu and SUN's RI

2006-08-08 Thread Mike Kienenberger (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-53?page=comments#action_12426624 ] Mike Kienenberger commented on TOMAHAWK-53: --- The wiki is probably out of date. I've updated it based on the information you've provided, but since I

Re: myfaces 114

2006-08-08 Thread Dennis Byrne
+1 Dennis ? :) Yeah, I can do it if the jars are ready w/in ten hours. If not, it'll be another 24 hours. Dennis Byrne 3) Yes, with the caveat that there is no easy way to 'promote' an artifact from the snapshot to the ibiblio-rsync repo. You can't just copy files over, since Maven

Re: [jira] Created: (TOMAHAWK-251) previousRowDataVar is not saved/resto

2006-08-08 Thread Tom Cordova
Using the datascroller to go to a different page causes this to null out. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28TOMAHAWK-251%29-previousRowDataVar-is-not-saved-restored-tf1444681.html#a5711527 Sent from the My Faces - Dev forum at Nabble.com.

The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
After Core 1.1.4 is done, should we delete the tomahawk branch that was created on June 21st, and re-copy it from the 1.1.5-SNAPSHOT trunk? I think there have been several changes on the trunk that ought to be in the next release, and it's probably easier to start over. Which brings up another

Re: The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-08 Thread Mike Kienenberger
Since my opinion on the matter has been misinterpreted previously, let me try to restate it here. After a branch, all changes should be made to the trunk. If a branch has a major-priority error that has been fixed in trunk, it should be merged back to the branch (and ideally, a new minor branch

Re: The Tomahawk 1.1.4 branch

2006-08-08 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 8/8/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After a branch, all changes should be made to the trunk. If a branch has a major-priority error that has been fixed in trunk, it should be merged back to the branch (and ideally, a new minor branch release would be made 1.1.major.minor).