[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-124.
--
Resolution: Incomplete
> jscookMenu hides flash files.
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-226.
--
Resolution: Invalid
not a bug!!!
> After submit, backed bean date is one day before calendar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-394.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> No documentation for extended versions of standard components
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-572.
--
Resolution: Later
Assignee: Hazem Saleh
> TreeTable should have a property to alllow cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hazem Saleh resolved TOMAHAWK-742.
--
Resolution: Later
> Multiline Tab
> -
>
> Key: TOMAHAWK-742
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605745#action_12605745
]
Hazem Saleh commented on TOMAHAWK-781:
--
I need an example to replicate!!!
> Unable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605743#action_12605743
]
Neal Haggard commented on TOMAHAWK-922:
---
We similarly are trying to move from MyFac
VIEWSTATE_PARAM parsing in StateManager doesn't always work
---
Key: PORTLETBRIDGE-37
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PORTLETBRIDGE-37
Project: MyFaces Portlet Bridge
Issue T
I've made some changes to ClassMeta and QdoxModelBuilder.
What used to be called "superClassName" is now called
sourceClassParentClassName. However before it was actually tweaked
depending on whether the class was a template or not. Now it is *always*
the parent of the annotated class
That does
OK Thanks Simon.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:05 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 21:58 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > Iam just wondering what should I do to solve the following issue :
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1025
>
> I'll dea
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 21:58 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Iam just wondering what should I do to solve the following issue :
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1025
I'll deal with that one if you want. I've sorted out similar stuff for a
couple of other projects.
It does
Hi Team,
Iam just wondering what should I do to solve the following issue :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1025
Thanks all!
--
Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed
http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
And by the way, better remember that there will soon be a JSF2.0
branch..
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 12:57 -0500, Leonardo Uribe wrote:
> Ahhh, Ok, thanks for the information. That's right. If exists a vote,
> no way.
>
> Checking the svn there is a jsf 1.1 branch here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repo
Ahhh, Ok, thanks for the information. That's right. If exists a vote, no
way.
Checking the svn there is a jsf 1.1 branch here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/commons/branches/jsf_11/
And the trunk is the jsf 1.2 branch:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/commons/trunk/
But if thi
Please see here:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Commons-API-JSF-1.2-only-tp14178115p14180119.html
The consensus was to have commons be JSF 1.2 and a separate branch for
JSF 1.1 if desired. Therefore, we should place the 1.1 code in a
separate location and the main trunk folders should be JSF 1.2 on
Hi,
i had missread the previous posts :-(
I validateCompareTo goes into commons (i was under the impression that
not, because tomahawk specific code)
than it's perfectly ok to skip (and deprecate in tomahwak) validateEquals.
Regards,
Volker
2008/6/17 Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It should be deprecated because it adds nothing over validateCompareTo
and does not do the job of locating/computing/comparing two equal
input component values as well as validateCompareTo does.
Or to look at it another way, defining a validateEquals jsp or facelet
tag handler that points to the v
BTW, I believe a vote was already taken on commons, and the result was
that commons would be JSF 1.2 only with a 1.1 branch if ppl. wanted to
create one.
With this in mind, I am strongly -1 for the 1.2 code using 1.1 artifacts.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Compact mode renderer doesn't take account of holydays and custom
ScheduleEntryRenderer is ignored
--
Key: TOMAHAWK-1286
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOM
I didn't say I will start before the 72 hours.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Any new votes ?
>
>
> usually it is a bad signal to rush things like that.
> I know you are
+1 for adding examples.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leo,
> I will start adding the base exporterListener to commons after your
> refactoring.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I'll
Leo,
I will start adding the base exporterListener to commons after your
refactoring.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'll start to refactor myfaces-commons to the new proposed layout (I'm not
> started this yet because it was necessary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12605512#action_12605512
]
martin piekorz commented on TRINIDAD-1123:
--
Would be nice! I try to get trindad
Hi,
> validateEqual should be deprecated because validateCompareTo it is better
> (according to the suggestion of Mike), so this validator should stay on
> tomahawk. The rest of converters and validators only be referenced by
if validateEqual works in non tomahawk environment why make it depreca
24 matches
Mail list logo