Hi,
Is there any reason why the UIComponentTag appends jsp
to all the component ids in 1.1.3/1.1.4? Any chance this can be removed for
1.1.4 so that it returns the same ids as UIViewRoot.createUniqueId() and the
RI?
Thanks,
h
In addition, I am very proud to announce that CA will be co-sponsoring
the event this year. I'll let Jonas fill everyone in on the details once
he returns.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matthias Wessendorf
Sent: Wednesday, April 26,
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:51 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: idea regarding components
On 4/18/06, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually unfortunately martin pointed me towards a huge
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 5:13 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: idea regarding components
On 4/18/06, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reading that link and under those rules, I would think
Ill be there!
From: Jonas Jacobi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006
9:55 AM
To: MyFaces Development; MyFaces
Discussion
Subject: The annual MyFaces
JavaOne party/dinner
Hi All,
Its getting close to JavaOne and it is time to add the MyFaces JavaOne
+1 to the reorganization.
I too feel this is the only way to release the 'Core' separate from any
components, and that separate releases are vital to all of the MyFaces
projects.
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 3:43 AM
I'd appreciate it if one of the committers could look at MYFACES-1027
(It is currently assigned to Bruno). I submitted a patch a few weeks
back and I would be very grateful if someone could verify that it is
correct and check it in before 1.1.2 is released.
-Original Message-
From:
I'd appreciate it if MYFACES-1026 MYFACES-1027 could be addressed
before the branch.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Marinschek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:01 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: MyFaces 1.1.2 RC-1
Hi all,
Manfred and me would
Hi All,
Can any of the committers out there take a look at two issues I reported
a while back?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1026
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1027
Thanks in advance,
h.
AFAIK, findComponent on a Table items works in the RI. (I found a note
to myself from last august to figure out why MyFaces does not :) ).
Because the table is a naming container, I believe you can override its
findComponent method to do the right thing. I imagine this is what the
RI's
Hi Everyone,
Forgive me in advance if the following questions sound
insensitive to the hard work thats been going into getting maven going. I
havent been following that thread so I dont know the current
state of things.
I want to use some of the functionality and fixes that have
gone
Thanks, I'll look at the wiki and give maven a try tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:12 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Nightlys and 1.1.2
Abrams, Howard A wrote:
1. How close are we to having
+1 for:
nightly + votes = M1
nightly + votes = M2
.
.
M[n] + votes + branch = RC1
RC1 + bug fixes = RC2
RC2 + bug fixes = RC3
.
.
RC[n] + votes - 1.[n]
[SNIP]
A milestone release could even be just a nightly build renamed (or
maybe
not even renamed). They would be
How about just releasing smaller bug-fix releases, more often? I tried
to start the conversation about then 1.1.2 would be released and the
'roadmap', but the conversation has stalled.
Should we call a vote to begin the release process for 1.1.2?
-Original Message-
From: Simon
from that question... ;) ) In any case, I hope we can
come to some conclusion quickly, I'd like to start making this happen.
Travis
On 12/7/05, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern would be that things will get out of hand and we'll do so
much logging that it will affect
On 12/7/05, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My concern would be that things will get out of hand and we'll do so
much logging that it will affect performance in a noticeable way. We
should find a way to compile-out some of the logging for
production
use before logging everthing
not a lawyer), the CDDL looks compatible with the
Apache license to me.
On 12/2/05, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while back someone asked if ASF was reviewing CDDL to allow
including
part of glassfish into a future MyFaces JSF1.2 implementation. Did a
review ever happen
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 8:14 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
[Snip]
I'm not wild about multiple nightly versions, etc. Perhaps we could
use the roadmap as is being suggested
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 11:23 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
2005/11/23, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What if someone reported with affects [Nightly]. If we rename
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:19 PM, Abrams, Howard A wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a release plan for 1.1.2? It seems there are a
significant
number of issues on the trunk; some of which may not be marked
as
such in JIRA.
Also, now that we've gotten passed
. Can you
please check if this gives you enough rights?
Thanks,
Manfred
2005/11/21, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If you're certain that issues on the custom/extended components have
no
chance of holding up a release (other than taking resources away
from
fixing issue in the api
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:26 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Plan for 1.1.2?
Howard,
You are now member of myfaces-developers group on Jira. Can you
please check if this gives you enough rights?
Thanks,
Manfred
2005/11/21, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED
all agree
that
its time for a new release.
sean
On 11/21/05, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've done a quick and dirty pass through the open issues, and
made the
following changes:
* Renamed 'Nightly' to '1.1.2'
* Added a few seemingly very
this, right?
regards,
Martin
On 11/22/05, Abrams, Howard A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there are several points of confusion here, and I'm not sure
on
whose part.
The version number in JIRA is listed as 'fix-for', which to me meant
that is the version we plan to fix the issue
Hi all,
Is there a release plan for 1.1.2? It seems there are a
significant number of issues on the trunk; some of which may not be marked as
such in JIRA.
Also, now that weve gotten passed the TCK, moved to
SVN, and broken out the various sub projects, Id like to revisit the
subject
JSF 1.2 spec requires JDK 5.
From: Keith Lynch
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005
9:29 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: JDK 1.5, JSP 2.0 XML
This is certainly a large
issue. Some products still have to support Java 1.3.
At ILOG I had major
Hi everyone,
Stan can probably answer this, but I thought I'd send the question to
the entire list:
Forgive me, I'm not (yet) a portlet person, but should the MyFaces
implementation of portlet support create unique components IDs across
different portlets? How else is one supposed to use two
Thanks Manfred!
-Original Message-
From: Manfred Geiler (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:44 AM
To: dev@myfaces.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Resolved: (MYFACES-359) JspViewHandlerImpl.createView
doesn't play nice with
decorators
[
+1, excellent idea. Then maybe my spec-related bugs will get noticed
among all the 'tree2' bugs :)
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 2:27 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: [proposal] Add some meaningful 'component' entries
From the 1.1 spec:
The class and method Javadoc documentation for the classes and
interfaces in
javax.faces (and its subpackages) are incorporated by reference as
requirements
of this Specification.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July
AFAIK, JSF 1.2 won't be really 'final' until Java EE 5 is final.
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 7:24 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: MyFaces w/ Facelets
Ed Burns (JSF co-spec lead) usually tags his emails with
+1
-Original Message-
From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:34 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: uidata, svn reorg and tomahawk
I confess to forgetting the abbreviation taxonomy, but does impl
below refer to the JSF container
Read Craigs reply again. Its
not that colons are not allowed in *HTML, its that they are use by the
naming container to separate the containers id from the components
id. The HTML generated by JSF Renderers will have colons in it.
From: Matt Blum
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry I'm coming into this late, so forgive me if this was covered and I
missed it:
What is the status on getting access to the TCK?
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2005 5:56 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Who
Isn't having a separate 'shared' jar project an issue? Either it is tied
to the impl or to the components. We can't tie the 'shared' jar's
release to both; it would put the impl our-of-sync with the components
or visa-versa. Releasing the shared jar with the impl makes sense to me.
+1 for the
-1
Perhaps I'm crazy or winzip did something weird, but it appears
myfaces-1.0.9-src.tar.gz contains myfaces-1.0.9.tgz and myfaces-1.0.9-src.tgz.
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 5:17 AM
To:
that this has been resolved.
sean
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:56:09 -0500, Abrams, Howard A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+0
I suggest that the MyFaces custom components be moved to a
subproject. A
debate such as Tree vs. Tree2 shouldn't hold up a release of the
JSF
implementation and API
implementation separate from the custom components. So it is
already possible to use the JSF Implementation without the components.
Is this what you are after or are you looking for something more?
sean
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:50:16 -0500, Abrams, Howard A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not so
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:49 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: [VOTE] Simplified Examples (was Simplified Examples)
OK I am changing the subject to a simple vote. +1 if you favor
*replacing*
Hi,
I've been playing around with some custom components and I ran into a
problem with myFaces 1.0.8 (vs. the Sun reference implementation). I
wanted to bring it up to the list before I created a new issue.
In the reference implementation, UIInput has a protected method
'validateValue'. By
40 matches
Mail list logo
