Hi
Thanks to all people who vote.
We have 10 +1 for jul
Mario Ivankovits
Simon Lessard
Werner Punz
Gerhard Petracek
Michael Concini
Grant Smith
Mike Kienenberger
Jan-Kees Van Andel
Manfred Geiler
Cagatay Civici
So we can continue with this change. There is a proposal about how to do
this change
+1 for JUL.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Manfred Geiler wrote:
> +1 for JUL
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:02, Matthias Wessendorf
> wrote:
> > +1 for JUL
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
> > wrote:
> >> +1 for JUL.
> >>
> >> Jan-Kees van Andel
> >>
> >>
> >> 200
+1 for JUL
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:02, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> +1 for JUL
>
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
> wrote:
>> +1 for JUL.
>>
>> Jan-Kees van Andel
>>
>>
>> 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger :
>>> +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't
>>
+1 for JUL
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jan-Kees van Andel
wrote:
> +1 for JUL.
>
> Jan-Kees van Andel
>
>
> 2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger :
>> +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't
>> require any dependencies.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
+1 for JUL.
Jan-Kees van Andel
2009/10/1 Mike Kienenberger :
> +1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't
> require any dependencies.
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
>> +1 java.util.logging.Logger
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini
+1 for jul -- it's not ideal, but it's the standard and doesn't
require any dependencies.
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Grant Smith wrote:
> +1 java.util.logging.Logger
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini wrote:
>> +1 for JUL
>>
>> Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>>
>>> 2009/10/1 Wer
+1 java.util.logging.Logger
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Concini wrote:
> +1 for JUL
>
> Antonio Petrelli wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/1 Werner Punz :
>>
Why don't you consider using SLF4J?
Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try
anyway :-D
>>>
+1
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2009/10/1 Werner Punz
> Again +1 for jul...
>
> One dependency less is always a good thing.
>
> Werner
>
>
> Leonardo Uribe sc
+1 for JUL
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
2009/10/1 Werner Punz :
Why don't you consider using SLF4J?
Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try
anyway :-D
That would be a dependency replacement with another.
Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J
Don't
2009/10/1 Werner Punz :
>> Why don't you consider using SLF4J?
>> Probably it is the same question asked over and over again, but I try
>> anyway :-D
>>
> That would be a dependency replacement with another.
> Just my personal opinion regarding SLF4J
Don't bother, I noticed that there is a bridge
Antonio Petrelli schrieb:
2009/10/1 Leonardo Uribe :
Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this
form:
protected final static Logger log =
Logger.getLogger("facelets.viewhandler");
But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if there is no
agree
2009/10/1 Leonardo Uribe :
> Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this
> form:
>
> protected final static Logger log =
> Logger.getLogger("facelets.viewhandler");
>
> But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if there is no
> agreement about use
IMHO configuring the logger has to be solved by the used container.
Ciao,
Mario
Von: Simon Lessard [mailto:simon.lessar...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 16:57
An: MyFaces Development
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0
+1 for jul. However
Again +1 for jul...
One dependency less is always a good thing.
Werner
Leonardo Uribe schrieb:
Hi
Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in
this form:
protected final static Logger log =
Logger.getLogger("facelets.viewhandler");
But the original myface
g, 01. Oktober 2009 04:06
> *An:* MyFaces Development
> *Betreff:* [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in
> this form:
>
> protected final static Logger log =
>
+1 for jul
reduces dependencies - and sun also use it, no?
Von: Leonardo Uribe [mailto:lu4...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 01. Oktober 2009 04:06
An: MyFaces Development
Betreff: [VOTE] use of jul or commons logging on myfaces core 2.0
Hi
Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0
Hi
Right now, facelets code added to myfaces core 2.0.x branch uses jul in this
form:
protected final static Logger log =
Logger.getLogger("facelets.viewhandler");
But the original myfaces code uses commons logging, (so if there is no
agreement about use jul, we should unify logging code usi
17 matches
Mail list logo
