Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-17 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Dennis Byrne schrieb: So what do you mean by add the license to the licenses section? There is a licenses dir under src/main/resources/ for most projects. Oh, I see, wasnt aware that this is allows, tough, even better :-) Thanks! Ciao, Mario

Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-16 Thread Martin Marinschek
No. we can just add the license to the licenses section of sandbox, should be ok. Sharath should file a CLA, though. Has anyone pointed him to the corresponding page so far? regards, Martin On 4/13/06, Dennis Byrne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What to do next? How can we ensure that there is no

Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-16 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Martin, welcome back - hope you had a nice vacation :-) we can just add the license to the licenses section of sandbox, should be ok. Apache do not allow to have anything else then ASF license in their repositories, no? And only a handful of licenses (out of my brain its only BSD) are

Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-16 Thread Dennis Byrne
Hello Mario, So what do you mean by add the license to the licenses section? There is a licenses dir under src/main/resources/ for most projects. Dennis Byrne

[al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-13 Thread Mario Ivankovits
sharath reddy schrieb: Ok, I see that NavigationMenuItems already has a List attribute. I could probably use this. I can submit a patch. Great! BTW, below is the license from the original files. I am sorry if I seem to be a bit naive about license issues No problem, licensing stuff is

Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-13 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 4/13/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Copyright (c) 2005, Pragmatic Objects - Kevin H. Le It looks like a pretty standard BSD license. Do Le and Sharath have to sign a CLA? Yes, it would be best if Le signed a CLA and agreed to release this under the Apache 2.0 license.

Re: [al] license question [was [jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-250) New 'Outlook Menu' type component for Sandbox]

2006-04-13 Thread Dennis Byrne
What to do next? How can we ensure that there is no license problem? Do Le and Sharath have to sign a CLA? To play it safe, yes ( as well as Pragmatic Objects ). The apache main site has information on corporate intellectual property contributions. Dennis Byrne