[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-10-04 Thread Ronald Brill (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12331250 ] Ronald Brill commented on MYFACES-628: -- Hi Bill In the FacesServlet.service method I can wrap the call to lifecycle.render... from my point of view it's better to

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-10-03 Thread Ronald Brill (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12331215 ] Ronald Brill commented on MYFACES-628: -- Hi Bill, i finaly setup eclipse+subversion and the whole rest. (devours all my spare time for the last days :-( But at the

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-10-03 Thread Bill Dudney (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12331221 ] Bill Dudney commented on MYFACES-628: - Hi Ronald, Here is the logging code; private boolean shouldSkipPhaseProcessing(FacesContext facesContext, String phase,

Re: [jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-10-03 Thread Bill Dudney
Hi Ronald, Just FYI, you don't have to have Eclipse up and running to get a myfaces-all.jar. Simply checkout the code with SVN and issue an 'ant dist-all' command from the build directory. In the end you will have a myfaces-all.jar file in the build/dist directory. HTH. -bd- On Oct 3,

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-10-02 Thread Bill Dudney (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12331129 ] Bill Dudney commented on MYFACES-628: - HI Ronald, The fix I put in on the 30th caused pages to stop drawing in the RC1. I have reverted part of the fix for this bug to

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-09-30 Thread Ronald Brill (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12330912 ] Ronald Brill commented on MYFACES-628: -- Hi, (i'm the colleague from Holger ...) Checked your fix (myfaces-20050929-src) Bad news, the fix seems to work for the first 5

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-09-30 Thread Ronald Brill (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12330955 ] Ronald Brill commented on MYFACES-628: -- Yes, but i like to have two different messages for the different reasons/states. Its important for me to know (from the logs)

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-09-28 Thread Bill Dudney (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12330690 ] Bill Dudney commented on MYFACES-628: - I think I have this fixed, testing now. Holger - will you be able to test it out in your app with the RC that Sean will put out

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-09-28 Thread Holger Schimanski (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12330691 ] Holger Schimanski commented on MYFACES-628: --- Wow, very fast response! I am on holiday next week, but I talk to a colleague to check it. Thanks a lot! Current

[jira] Commented: (MYFACES-628) Current Lifecycle implementation violates JSF Spec 1.1

2005-09-27 Thread Holger Schimanski (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-628?page=comments#action_12330581 ] Holger Schimanski commented on MYFACES-628: --- Yes, RI is doing right. We came to this problem when switching from RI 1.1 to MyFaces 1.1.0. Current Lifecycle