I think that a new vote is unnecessary, since a vote already occurred
[1] to promote/move non-rendering components and listeners to
myfaces-commons-components, and the result is to move then to this
project [2].
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg35547.html
[2] http://ww
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> It'd make a lot more sense to have the vote be to promote the
> component to Commons since that's the consensus so far, instead of
> voting against it being promoted to Tomahawk.
>
+1 on vote about promote to commons.
It'd make a lot more sense to have the vote be to promote the
component to Commons since that's the consensus so far, instead of
voting against it being promoted to Tomahawk.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the old discussion, there was a vote that was
hello,
+1 for a new vote
regards,
gerhard
2008/11/13 Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In the old discussion, there was a vote that was already done, and the vote
> determined promoting the
> component to Tomahawk.
>
> Should I make a new voting and suspend the component promotion to Tomahawk
In the old discussion, there was a vote that was already done, and the vote
determined promoting the
component to Tomahawk.
Should I make a new voting and suspend the component promotion to Tomahawk ?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Gerhard Petracek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sounds good to
sounds good to me.
regards,
gerhard
2008/11/13 Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Since it doesn't render anything, perhaps it should?
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > What about Simon's suggestion that we promote it to commons instead
Since it doesn't render anything, perhaps it should?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about Simon's suggestion that we promote it to commons instead of
> Tomahawk? Any reason not to go down that path?
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Hazem
What about Simon's suggestion that we promote it to commons instead of
Tomahawk? Any reason not to go down that path?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Refactoring is done.
> Tomorrow will promote the component to Tomahawk.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:0
Refactoring is done.
Tomorrow will promote the component to Tomahawk.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are one team.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Robinson <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hazem,
>>
>> I have been really busy, thank y
We are one team.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Andrew Robinson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hazem,
>
> I have been really busy, thank you for volunteering to promote my
> component, I really appreciate it.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hazem,
I have been really busy, thank you for volunteering to promote my
component, I really appreciate it.
-Andrew
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:12 AM, Hazem Saleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I can work on this task.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi Hazem,
If you have time then that would be great!
The discussion thread can be found here:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Upgrade-s:limitRendered-to-tomahawk-td18226749.html
Regards,
Simon
Hazem Saleh schrieb:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I can work on this task.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Si
Hi Simon,
I can work on this task.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Simon Kitching <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> There was a discussion a while ago on this list about promoting the
> sandbox s:limitRendered component (written by Andrew Robinson) into
> tomahawk.
>
> There seemed to be
Hi All,
There was a discussion a while ago on this list about promoting the
sandbox s:limitRendered component (written by Andrew Robinson) into
tomahawk.
There seemed to be general agreement that it was useful, but that some
rework should be done, including:
* renaming to t:renderOne
* simplifyin
14 matches
Mail list logo