-Original Message-
From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 8:03 PM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: Core 1.1.2 Branch - Incorrect Dependency?
Jeremy,
You're correct about the dependency. I had changed it in the
dependency section but forgot
On 4/13/06, Jeremy J. Grelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we supposed to be testing the Tomahawk 1.1.2 branch as well, or is
the focus just on Shared and Core right now?
Shared and Core right now.
I ask because as it stands
right now in the branch, Tomahawk's core pom.xml is still pointing
I believe this branch should be blown away entirely. The 1.1.2 stuff
is on the trunk. We created this branch a while ago to sort out the
tohawk/shared refactoring. Now that everything has been merged down I
think this branch should be killed.
Any objections?
Sean
On 4/13/06, Mike
Hi!
Now that everything has been merged down I
think this branch should be killed.
Any objections?
My last patch is not merged down, shall I commit it there?
Ciao,
Mario
Oh, you didnt mean shared, sorry, I'll stop computing for today ;-)
---
Mario
Now that everything has been merged down I
think this branch should be killed.
Any objections?
My last patch is not merged down, shall I commit it there?
Ciao,
Mario
We should wait and merge down everything (on both branches) once the
release is finalized. I guess we make an exception for the one
command link thing you fixed earlier where the branch fix is
incompatible with the trunk code. Please remind me to do this though
when the time comes.
Sean
On
Jeremy,
You're correct about the dependency. I had changed it in the
dependency section but forgot about Manfred's shared refactoring
magic. Good catch. I'm checking in a fixed POM now.
Sean
On 4/12/06, Jeremy J. Grelle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone. I just started to try and
