right... 1.5 things are involved, good point
-M
On 10/27/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No discussion/action taken by original committer -- reverting.
Note that I think these converters would be a good candidate for
sandbox15 and Tomahawk 1.2, and I recommend checking them
No discussion/action taken by original committer -- reverting.
Note that I think these converters would be a good candidate for
sandbox15 and Tomahawk 1.2, and I recommend checking them back into
that location.
On 10/26/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
good point.
On 10/25/07,
I have another question.
Why were these three converters checked into Tomahawk with absolutely
no discussion and nothing going through the sandbox first?
I search my mail archives for AtomicLongConverter and the ONLY
reference to it is the commit itself.
-Mike
On 9/16/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
good point.
On 10/25/07, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have another question.
Why were these three converters checked into Tomahawk with absolutely
no discussion and nothing going through the sandbox first?
I search my mail archives for AtomicLongConverter and the ONLY
