[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835635#action_12835635
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
I agree with Michael in that the faces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835679#action_12835679
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2564:
I don't say we should reject older
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835716#action_12835716
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
Sorry for being inaccurate in my previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835722#action_12835722
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2564:
No problem!
Hmm, I don't know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835775#action_12835775
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
Which faces-configs do you check to decide
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835789#action_12835789
]
Matthias Weßendorf commented on MYFACES-2564:
-
According to section 10.1.2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835792#action_12835792
]
Yury Kats commented on MYFACES-2564:
Interesting point, would this also imply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835791#action_12835791
]
Leonardo Uribe commented on MYFACES-2564:
-
The patch is valid but we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835817#action_12835817
]
Michael Concini commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
I can certainly agree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835822#action_12835822
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
@Yury: No, the spec says: ... and must
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835826#action_12835826
]
Ganesh Jung commented on MYFACES-2564:
--
I'd prefer keeping two separate threads
facelets in an app with a 1.2 level faces-config do not work
Key: MYFACES-2564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564
Project: MyFaces Core
Issue Type: Bug
Hey Michael,
I closed your MYFACES-2564 ticket, as we discussed this already.
There is another open ticket for the problem
-Matthias
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
I'm aware of the previous discussion, however my understanding was that
it related more to supporting the using the legacy facelets library and
doesn't appear to have anything to do with faces-config versioning.
My fix in MYFACES-2564 just brings us into consistent behavior with how
verseion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835289#action_12835289
]
Jakob Korherr commented on MYFACES-2564:
Please revert the changes, because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jakob Korherr reopened MYFACES-2564:
facelets in an app with a 1.2 level faces-config do not work
of the previous discussion, however my understanding was that it
related more to supporting the using the legacy facelets library and doesn't
appear to have anything to do with faces-config versioning.
My fix in MYFACES-2564 just brings us into consistent behavior with how
verseion info in config files
to have anything to do with
faces-config versioning.
My fix in MYFACES-2564 just brings us into consistent behavior
with how verseion info in config files are supposed to be treated.
As I've been made to understand it, they are only for use in
schema validation and not for use
and doesn't
appear to have anything to do with faces-config versioning.
My fix in MYFACES-2564 just brings us into consistent behavior with how
verseion info in config files are supposed to be treated. As I've been made
to understand it, they are only for use in schema validation
19 matches
Mail list logo
