come back to active status as a committer
> > > and
> > > > > Iâm
> > > > > > > willing to commit to:
> > > > > > > 1. Review and merge of code.
> > > > > > > 2. Vet releases
> > > > > > >
>
gt; 2. Vet releases
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ken
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Jun 20, 2017, at 10:26 AM, yuliya Feldman
> > > > > <yufeld...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
> > > > > > wrot
; > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sorry for chiming in late. I was out of town.
> > > > > > I think we should keep the project going if there is an activity
> on
> > > the
> > > > > project.
> &g
> > I can definitely contribute time to vet the release, review and
> merge.
> > I
> > > may not be able to actively work on the project as it is not inline
> with
> > my
> > > current work schedule.
> > > > Thanks,Yuliya
> > > >
> > >
ent work schedule.
> > > Thanks,Yuliya
> > >
> > > From: Darin Johnson <dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> > > To: Dev <dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:19 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Vote] Retire Myriad
1...@gmail.com>
> > To: Dev <dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:19 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Vote] Retire Myriad
> >
> > Swapnil: I only counted myself and Adam, if there's two additional
> > committers who are willi
he project as it is not inline with my
> current work schedule.
> Thanks,Yuliya
>
> From: Darin Johnson <dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
> To: Dev <dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vote] Retire Myriad
>
&g
schedule.
Thanks,Yuliya
From: Darin Johnson <dbjohnson1...@gmail.com>
To: Dev <dev@myriad.incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vote] Retire Myriad
Swapnil: I only counted myself and Adam, if there's two additional
committers who are wi
Swapnil: I only counted myself and Adam, if there's two additional
committers who are willing to vet the release AND merge commits I'll
consider changing my vote.
Darin
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Swapnil Daingade <
swapnil.daing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am trying to understand what
I am trying to understand what changed since the last discussion.
If I remember correctly, Ted asked for 3-5 committers to vet the next
release.
4 committers said they were willing. Did I miss something ?
Regards
Swapnil
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 7:35 AM, John Yost wrote:
+1
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Klaus Ma wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:13 PM Brandon Gulla
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (if the vote is open to non-comitters)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Darin Johnson
+1
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:13 PM Brandon Gulla
wrote:
> +1 (if the vote is open to non-comitters)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Darin Johnson wrote:
>
> > Based on previous discussions it seems the best course of action. I'm
> >
+1 (if the vote is open to non-comitters)
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Darin Johnson wrote:
> Based on previous discussions it seems the best course of action. I'm
> holding the vote open for 3 business days.
>
> I'm +1 binding.
>
> Darin
>
--
Brandon
Based on previous discussions it seems the best course of action. I'm
holding the vote open for 3 business days.
I'm +1 binding.
Darin
14 matches
Mail list logo