Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad?

+1 On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 11:10 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi All, > > It seems that Myriad has more or less stopped activity. Recent user > question has lead to a recommendation to avoid using Myriad in production > [1], git commits seem to have stopped a long time ago

[DISCUSS] Retire Myriad?

Hi All, It seems that Myriad has more or less stopped activity. Recent user question has lead to a recommendation to avoid using Myriad in production [1], git commits seem to have stopped a long time ago [2], and potential community contributions [3] have gone unanswered. Your reports have been

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

Sure. I'll work on creating the podling report and submitting it. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:05 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Ok. I'm willing to wait. However, you'll need to follow up quickly. > I'll also point out that the podling report is due, none submitted. > Hopefully

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

Ok. I'm willing to wait. However, you'll need to follow up quickly. I'll also point out that the podling report is due, none submitted. Hopefully one can be provided soon. John On 2017-11-07 12:57, mohit soni wrote: > I think we should be able to address the

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

I think we should be able to address the concerns around PR reviews and releases while still being a part of the Incubator. Also, I am fine with driving future features with help of Darin and others in the community. Honestly, I would prefer to keep the project in the Incubator for all the

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

Just so you are aware, it is completely feasible to fork the project to continue work on it outside of Apache, if you decide on retirement. We generally don't even pursue naming issues for former podlings, since we would have not done anything to claim the TM. Maybe it is possible to build up

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

Agree with Darin and Mohit. I think the project is still very relevant, but there is no one actively working on it - I myself couldn't put time on it as the problem space my employer operates in is very different from Myriad's. If Mohit is willing to drive the future features and Darin is ready to

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

I certainly think the project is relevant but I'm concerned if it belongs in Apache. When I was active it was difficult to get people to review pull requests and when releasing v0.2.0 it was hard to even get people to vote for a release. If only a few people are going to work on it, maybe it's

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

The project's core idea of dynamic creation and management of YARN clusters without creating static partitions is still relevant. This project and it's community were one of the first movers in the still developing space of stateful containerized distributed systems. I believe the project is

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

Just to be clear, this is a discussion thread. Not a vote thread. While I believe many people vote +1 because they feel its clear why, when you vote against the idea you should explain why. So please, treat this more like a discussion rather than a vote and explain why. On 2017-11-05 13:50,

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

I believe this project is a cool idea yet no one seems interested enough to invest in it (myself included). I checked and at this moment - The last commit I could find is dated Oct 7, 2016 (read: 13 months without ANY commits) - In 2017: The mailing list (ignoring "Jira" emails and email sent to

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

+1 to retire (non-committer) On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Niels Basjes wrote: > +1 vote to retire (non-committer) > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla > wrote: > > > +1 vote to retire (non-committer) > > > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

-1 vote to not retire the project (committer, PMC) I believe the project is still relevant. On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Niels Basjes wrote: > +1 vote to retire (non-committer) > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla > wrote: > > > +1

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

+1 vote to retire (non-committer) On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Brandon Gulla wrote: > +1 vote to retire (non-committer) > > On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > All, > > > > Based on the current state of Myriad and

Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

+1 vote to retire (non-committer) On Sun, Nov 5, 2017 at 9:03 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Based on the current state of Myriad and prior discussions I'd like to > start the discussions around retiring the project. > > John > -- Brandon

[DISCUSS] Retire Myriad

All, Based on the current state of Myriad and prior discussions I'd like to start the discussions around retiring the project. John