[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julien Nioche closed NUTCH-1112.
Resolution: Duplicate
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1089 already fixed this. Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105971#comment-13105971
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-251:
Hadi, this issue has been closed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105972#comment-13105972
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-1113:
-
We have a pretty meaty JUnit
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/5/
--
[...truncated 5625 lines...]
compile:
[echo] Compiling plugin: lib-regex-filter
[javac]
https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/ws/src/plugin/build-plugin.xml:117:
warning:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105994#comment-13105994
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1005:
--
{quote}
you are right. I'd read your comments
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/6/
--
[...truncated 1056 lines...]
A src/plugin/urlnormalizer-pass/src/java/org/apache
A src/plugin/urlnormalizer-pass/src/java/org/apache/nutch
A
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-branch-1.4/7/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lewis John McGibbney updated NUTCH-1078:
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.0)
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0)
any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13106056#comment-13106056
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-623:
any comments on testing or the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13106060#comment-13106060
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-1078:
--
Ah, the org.apache.nutch.tools.Benchmark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13106068#comment-13106068
]
Lewis John McGibbney commented on NUTCH-1078:
-
thank you Markus. I noticed
Yep, here here. Great work Lewis!
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 16, 2011, at 4:24 AM, Markus Jelsma wrote:
thanks!
On Friday 16 September 2011 13:20:09 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
Branch 1.4 build set up and 'should' be running succesfully from now on.
This will also auto update any JIRA issues
Thanks Lewis, that's great!
On 16 September 2011 12:20, lewis john mcgibbney
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.comwrote:
Branch 1.4 build set up and 'should' be running succesfully from now on.
This will also auto update any JIRA issues which have been committed with
some Jenkins commentary.
At least
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Lewis John McGibbney updated NUTCH-1078:
Attachment: NUTCH-1078-branch-1.4-20110916-v4.patch
patch fixes the error logging
Am happy to call for a vote on the future of Nutch 2.0 if you want. Shall we
reduce the various options described before to a single one?
Julien
On 15 September 2011 19:55, Markus Jelsma markus.jel...@openindex.iowrote:
Hi Guys,
I thought I'd chime in on this thread. My comments below:
Hi Julien,
I didn't want to skip ship with this one, but it seems that the binding
community has already spoken their mind, and I for one shadow your
suggestion.
It's clear that trunk as it currently exists is not bleeding edge, there
have been too many broken fronts to launch a concentrated
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Nutch Wiki for change
notification.
The Website_Update_HOWTO page has been changed by LewisJohnMcgibbney:
http://wiki.apache.org/nutch/Website_Update_HOWTO?action=diffrev1=10rev2=11
1. Go to {{{forrest}}}. It is the
Option B) Shelve trunk in a branch and promote 1.4 to trunk. We can always
choose to hardwire HBASE (option D) later.
Markus
Am happy to call for a vote on the future of Nutch 2.0 if you want. Shall
we reduce the various options described before to a single one?
Julien
On 15 September
Why don't we just collect VOTEs for each of the options a-e, and then
figure out based on that if there is a majority. If there's no majority, we
can widdle it down to say the top 2-3, and then VOTE on those, looking
for majority again.
Cheers,
Chris
On Sep 16, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Markus
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-trunk/1606/
--
Started by timer
Building remotely on solaris1
hudson.util.IOException2: remote file operation failed:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Nutch-trunk/ws/ at
hudson.remoting.Channel@6d3bcf40:solaris1
20 matches
Mail list logo
