Hi Lewis,
2.1 is fine with me. This is assuming 2.x is a good naming scheme in the
first place. I must say that since the move of Nutchgora from trunk to
branch it's kind of odd that it's still referred to as 2.x. (For now that's
okay I guess).
Ferdy
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Lewis John
I must say that since the move of Nutchgora from trunk to branch it's kind
of odd that it's still referred to as 2.x. (For now that's okay I guess).
Moving it from the trunk made a lot of sense and has been abundantly
discussed on this list. We had one stable version which is actively
Hi Everyone,
As you guys will have seen I've quickly polluted our dev list again
(sorry!!!) with set and classify for 2.1.
The open issues for 2.0 are ones which I think we could address within the
2.0 release. This is merely my opinion, based upon the assertion that they
all contain patches
Great work Lewis, thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On Apr 25, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
Hi Everyone,
As you guys will have seen I've quickly polluted our dev list again
(sorry!!!) with set and classify for 2.1.
The open issues for 2.0 are ones which I think we could address
4 matches
Mail list logo
