le);
```
Please feel free to
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
ofbiz.apache.org
On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 10:43 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Hi Deepak,
You are right, I missed to conclude what I said at the end of the commit
comment ("I have to chec
Le 02/12/2022 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Eugen,
Actually I can live with changing java_home by hand instead of using a batch file, not a bid deal.
It was only a typo somewhere, RAM disk switching still works \o/
On this subject (RAM vs SSD) for those interested:
https
Hi Deepak,
You are right, I missed to conclude what I said at the end of the commit comment ("I
have to check the whole thing").
So did not see that the called handleOutput() closes the eli var, well spotted.
Now if we look at both r1797097
#wrapper_checksum_verification
I'm ready to push when the *nix version will be ready.
Jacques
Le 02/12/2022 à 11:23, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Eugen,
Actually I can live with changing java_home by hand instead of using a batch
file, not a bid deal.
I only have now to test these small changes
+1
Le 02/12/2022 à 16:31, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
In your opinion, I forward this on user list ?
to run OFBiz.
Regards,
Eugen
On 30.11.2022 19:39, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
I found the cause. For performance reason, and especially in order to be able to quickly switch from a JDK version to another, I use a batch file
to copy over JDKs to a RAM Disk. So java_home is always the same: this RAM Dis
what I have
read I guess since one version of JDK 16).
When setting java_home to the initial location of JDK 17, instead of the RAM
Disk, it works. I get only 2 warnings when compiling.
I'll have another look ASAP...
Le 30/11/2022 à 16:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
After upgrading non-functional
;java.nio.file.Path.getFileName()" is null
I'll continue to dig starting from https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues/20837 (notably last comment). It seems a not so obvious issue. I don't
think it's related to my Windows version, but not sure...
Le 30/11/2022 à 13:24, Jacques Le Roux a écrit
Hi Eugen,
As you know I'm still on Win7 and was able to manage all related issues so far
(like the need to use npm 13.14.0 locally in build.gradle)
To simplify things I just committed the non functional Java changes unrelated
to Gradle and JDK upgrades, not the same than your for CsrfUtil
Hi Ayan, Your message has been (somehow) moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing List. Please subscribe to the user ML for such
questions and then use your email client. See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html. You will get a better support, people can answer
you
Hi,
After answering
<< I never tried JDK 17 yet, but that should easy to upgrade when ready.>>
to Michael at https://lists.apache.org/thread/8cpz4dh7zoznp4mx2xxv35hns4j8mvf0
I thought it would be time to go for it. So far, I was wrong.
I just tried to use the last JDK 17 (Adoptium)
Hi Joël,
As announced at
https://lists.apache.org/thread/plrltvptwgvrmpfjfmlchdgl38vkofv1 the current
stable branch (18.12) is no longer supported.
But some people, like me, continue to backport bugfixes (maybe security ones)
to the branch.
So the best you can do is not for looking for a
Le 11/11/2022 à 10:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I'm not sure what the 1st line means, "not updating" what ? Found nothing googling...
Could be related to
https://support.atlassian.com/jira-cloud-administration/docs/configure-notification-schemes/
Default is OK :)
Hi,
With my last push for OFBIZ-12681 I got those 2 lines
remote: Saw GitHub meta-data in .asf.yaml, but not master/main or default
branch, not updating...
remote: [NOTICE] Notification scheme settings can only be applied to the
main/master/trunk or default branch.
I'm not sure what the 1st
Hi Max,
Your message has been moderated, else it would not have reached this Mailing
List.
Please subscribe to the user ML for such questions and then use your email
client.
See why here http://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html.
You will get a better support, people can answer you on the
Hi Eugen,
This seems to confirm what you said:
https://htmx.org/essays/a-real-world-react-to-htmx-port/
Thanks
Jacques
Le 08/08/2022 à 22:30, Eugen Stan a écrit :
Hello,
I recently came across htmx (and _hyperscript).
I am currently evaluating it - no real experience yet.
What I tested so
, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Nice to have you on board Leila, welcome!
Jacques
Le 03/10/2022 à 15:04, Ashish Vijaywargiya a écrit :
Many congratulations Leila and welcome aboard!!
--
Kind Regards,
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Vice President of Operations
*HotWax Systems*
*Enterprise open source experts
Nice to have you on board Leila, welcome!
Jacques
Le 03/10/2022 à 15:04, Ashish Vijaywargiya a écrit :
Many congratulations Leila and welcome aboard!!
--
Kind Regards,
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Vice President of Operations
*HotWax Systems*
*Enterprise open source experts*
Hi,
I finally decided to not change things
Le 21/09/2022 à 16:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Please read my last comment, what is your opinion about that?
W/o answers I'll do and close in a week
TIA
Jacques
Hi,
Please read my last comment, what is your opinion about that?
W/o answers I'll do and close in a week
TIA
Jacques
ing mechanism by commenting
out the reference in ofbiz-component.xml.
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 30.08.22 um 11:28 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Le 30/08/2022 à 10:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
It's a long time now I, from time to time, have a look at this issue. A
Hi,
FYI: Following below Infra advice on Slack I had to change the
https://www.schneier.com/essays/... URL:
Humbedooh17:53 <https://the-asf.slack.com/archives/CBX4TSBQ8/p1663170822890599>
<< @Jacques Le Roux you triggered the aardvark spam filter with the URL in your ticket. I
Hi Deepak,
I tried with Postgres, works like a charm with the old 9.1 version
Jacques
Le 14/09/2022 à 07:37, Deepak Dixit a écrit :
Please let me know if it looks good, I'll merge this.
This may cause issues with some of the databases.
I verified it's working fine with mysql and derby.
Hi Michael,
Did you get a chance?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 03/09/2022 à 20:21, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
I will dig into this further in the next days.
Thanks,
Michael
Am 30.08.22 um 11:28 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Le 30/08/2022 à 10:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
It's a long
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The Birt viewer version 4.5.0 has a security issue that allows this exploit.
We waited long for https://github.com/eclipse/birt/issues/625
to resolve but eventually decided to
disabled.
My apologies
Jacques
Le 02/09/2022 à 08:34, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The Birt viewer version 4.5.0 has a security issue that allows this exploit.
We waited long
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The Birt viewer version 4.5.0 has a security issue that allows this exploit.
We waited long for https://github.com/eclipse/birt/issues/625
to resolve but eventually decided to
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The Birt viewer version 4.5.0 has a security issue that allows this exploit.
We waited long for https://github.com/eclipse/birt/issues/625
to resolve but eventually decided to
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The Birt viewer version 4.5.0 has a security issue that allows this exploit.
We waited long for https://github.com/eclipse/birt/issues/625
to resolve but eventually decided to
Severity:
Low (only on shared servers)
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
The OFBiz Solr plugin is configured by default to automatically make a
RMI request on localhost, port 1099. By hosting a malicious RMI server
on
Severity:
High
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
Apache OFBiz up to version 18.12.05 is vulnerable to Regular
Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) in the way it handles URLs
provided by external, unauthenticated users.
Severity:
High (SSTI then possible RCE)
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
OFBiz versions prior to 18.12.06
Description:
As an ecommerce anonymous client, an external attacker can insert a malicious
content in a message “Subject” field from the "Contact us" page. Then a
The Apache OFBiz Project Team would like to inform you that OFBiz 18.12.06
is the last release of the 18.12 branch, which has reached its end of life and
won't be longer officially supported.
https://ofbiz.apache.org/release-notes-18.12.06.html
This announcement takes place on 2022-09-02 and
Le 30/08/2022 à 10:20, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
It's a long time now I, from time to time, have a look at this issue. At some
point I had at least 13 related links, remain open only:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7112 "EntityUtilProperties"
https://issues.apach
Hi,
It's a long time now I, from time to time, have a look at this issue. At some
point I had at least 13 related links, remain open only:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7112 "EntityUtilProperties"
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6712 "Increase the number of
Hi Jacopo,
+1
Checksum and GPG OK, running OFBiz too.
Thanks
Jacques
Le 25/08/2022 à 10:10, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.06", the sixth and
final release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
Hi Steve,
Of course, you are welcome to change the package names of the .groovy files.
Actually you may fix all issues Eclipse reports.
TIA
Jacques
Le 21/08/2022 à 00:10, Stephen Davidson a écrit :
Greetings.
I'm new to OFBiz, so if I am missing something or making a newbie mistake,
Hi Gil,
Here are my preferences inline...
Le 20/07/2022 à 23:49, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
Thanks All for the feedback.
I continue in my spare time and did analyse some rule that I propose to disable.
Here are my thought :
* DuplicateStringLiteral : Not Adapted to OFBiz : String
Hi Nicolas,
I did not try, how things works with Java 17?
Jacques
Le 15/07/2022 à 10:14, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hello,
I saw that break the CI github because I commited a List.of on release22.01 [1]
not supported by java 8
After a quick check, the CI work on java 8 and the documentation
Le 11/01/2022 à 17:54, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Also are missing, faculty to start a build from IRC and, more technical, the
possibility to use several servers to launch builds.
We had all that before...
Hi,
At least I have asked for faculty to start a build from IRC at
https
Hi Gil,
Great initiative, so far it seems we have a lazy consensus
We (almost*) did it for Java, why not for Groovy :)
Jacques
* OFBIZ-12341
Le 04/07/2022 à 17:24, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
Hello Devs,
I would like to continue Codenarc integration in OFBiz (OFBIZ-11167).
For those who
Hi,
We have a 404 at https://ofbiz.apache.org/release-notes-17.12.02.html
TIA
Actually this one is useless, we use latest in package.json. Dependabot does
not seem smart enough :)
Le 04/07/2022 à 18:09, GitBox a écrit :
JacquesLeRoux merged PR #518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/pull/518
the logic to be sure that we going to on the good way :)
If you confirm that this idea isn't wrong (break pattern or something
like that) I will open the issue to load the code
Cheers,
Nicolas
On 14/06/2022 17:21, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Pierre, Nicolas,
I like the idea of the right and wrong
Hi Pierre, Nicolas,
I like the idea of the right and wrong messages from form. Could we not have both (request-map and form) to use them accordingly to our (custom for
instance) needs?
Jacques
Le 14/06/2022 à 09:12, Pierre Gaudin a écrit :
Hi Nicolas,
The solution by putting the message
Hi Florian,
It all started with OFBIZ-1319. Then somehow related we had OFBIZ-9465 and at
some point we envisioned to use Require.js: OFBIZ-9976
Finally in trunk we use npm: OFBIZ-11960 (more with
Le 14/01/2022 à 18:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
We are still waiting for Infra for several missing features, the most important
being missing status emails: INFRA-22689
Also are missing, faculty to start a build from IRC and, more technical, the
possibility to use several servers to launch
BTW I created this Jira CSP related filter:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11889?filter=12351704
Le 07/05/2022 à 10:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Florian,
Yes, users could use their own CSP by changing the CSP-Report-Only default from
a property in security.properties
:)) ? So if a theme maintainer wants to include a
library/font/... from an external server, he could modify the CSP and avoid piling up warnings. But overriding only one value in a property file is
not possible (I think).
Le 06/05/2022 à 15:56, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Florian,
Welcome
Hi Florian,
Welcome, glad to have a new front end developer with us.
I indeed started to work on that in 2018, and just did the minimum:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10417
Later Alex Bodnaru (no longer working with us) created
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11889
Hi Lawrence,
Please help yourself: https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
TIA
Jacques
Le 03/05/2022 à 13:16, sevenwells ioautomata a écrit :
Hi Ofbiz admin,
Kindly add me to Ofbiz developer subscription.
Thank you
Lawrence Ndungu
Sevenwells
eBusiness Consultant
Hi,
Do we really want to do that?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10552
Jacques
's see how it goes
Jacques
Le 23/04/2022 à 19:10, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
As we don't have a direct access to settings in GH, I have rather created
INFRA-23193 for that
Jacques
Le 07/04/2022 à 08:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering how Dependabot works with Gradle, here is
Hi,
As we don't have a direct access to settings in GH, I have rather created
INFRA-23193 for that
Jacques
Le 07/04/2022 à 08:13, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
I was wondering how Dependabot works with Gradle, here is the answer
https://dev.to/cricketsamya/gradle-with-dependabot-1o47
So
y GitHub user asfgit (triggered by asfgit).
Head commit for run:
fa9a94ecf8f0a4a7ea16a1a37a4d9b5f4f1b7140 / Jacques Le
Roux
Improved: GH Actions and Buildbot Builders are not consistent (INFRA-23076)
It's now 2 weeks that INFRA-23076 is open, so like 3 weeks that BuildBot is not
working for OFBiz a
I have created OFBIZ-12596 for that
Le 09/04/2022 à 09:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
Fair enough, but we still need to keep those files up to date. For Gradle
dependencies we (I at least) use
<>
(see OFBIZ-10213)
The same can be done using "npx npm-check-updates&
in build.gradle.
Updating the JS libraries should be done explicitly together with necessary
tests.
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 08.04.22 um 16:49 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi,
Currently we load specific versions of js scripts (dependencies) with npm (see
pa
Hi,
Currently we load specific versions of js scripts (dependencies) with npm (see
package.json)
npm has a "latest" option that allows to automatically load the latest versions
of a js script.
We had only 3 js scripts versions that are not the latest. I changed all to
load latest versions.
Hi,
I was wondering how Dependabot works with Gradle, here is the answer
https://dev.to/cricketsamya/gradle-with-dependabot-1o47
So I'll try it tomorrow
Jacques
Le 05/04/2022 à 14:11, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
At least we can try and see how easy it is to apply those Dependabot PRs
At least we can try and see how easy it is to apply those Dependabot PRs, or be
inspired by them.
I trust we should be faster than any pen tester to fix issues (if possible,
dependencies can be complicated).
Le 05/04/2022 à 14:06, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
On the other hand we can simply
On the other hand we can simply neglect Dependabot and update when we
see/"feel" it's needed.
But that's not a much secure way. Having Dependabot running for us would have
prevented 2 current CVEs pending...
Jacques
Le 05/04/2022 à 14:02, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Micha
@a.o as far as I understand.
You can read more here:
https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/dependabot/dependabot-security-updates/about-dependabot-security-updates
J.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 1:25 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Jarek,
OK, but what about the others, those not public? I guess we can
Hi Team,
If nobody see a problem with that I'll create a Jira for that in 3 days, ie
Friday morning
Thanks
Jacques
Le 05/04/2022 à 06:30, Chris Lambertus a écrit :
Hi folks,
Infra is pleased to announce that GitHub’s Dependabot service has been approved
for use by ASF Legal and Infra, and
Hi Nicola,
I think Moqui is near from that.
Though not totally started from OFBiz it's quite inspired from David's long
experience with OFBiz
Jacques
Le 02/04/2022 à 19:29, Nicola Mazzoni a écrit :
I think it would be very interesting if some community developer were interested in creating
That's indeed a good idea.
There is already
https://infra.apache.org/new-committers-guide.html#set-up-subversion-or-git-access,
but I guess something simplified and focused for OFBiz new committers in wiki
may be useful indeed.
Giulio, this morning you also asked about
it for run:
1be718e818e03e595ea5e4ff6559b819ab9b7868 / Jacques Le Roux
Forgot a space before if
Report URL: https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/actions/runs/2081652160
With regards,
GitHub Actions via GitBox
Hi,
Infra ran the cron as root. It should be ofbizDemo user. I told them, I hope
all will be OK then
Thanks for your patience :)
Le 28/03/2022 à 18:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
The demos are back, next will only work tomorrow morning around 3 UTC
Enjoy
Jacques
Le 18/03/2022 à 11:46
Hi,
The demos are back, next will only work tomorrow morning around 3 UTC
Enjoy
Jacques
Le 18/03/2022 à 11:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Good news, demos will soon be back :).
Greg asked me to provide specs for a new OFBIZ-VM, I guess OFBIZ-VM4.
If nobody is against Monday I'll ask
and will have longer support.
Thoughts?
Michael
Am 23.03.2022 um 17:58 schrieb Jacques Le Roux :
BTW,
Is there someone who is already using Java 11 with 18.12?
TIA
Jacques
Le 23/03/2022 à 16:24, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
I don't remember clearly why I had that in mind. I have
ally (Win7) with "openjdk 11.0.2 2019-01-15"
for trunk.
Nobody ever crossed that?
TIA
Jacques
Le 18/03/2022 à 11:46, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Good news, demos will soon be back :).
Greg asked me to provide specs for a new OFBIZ-VM, I guess OFBIZ-VM4.
If nobody is against Monday I'll a
Ah forgot, did you fix the warnings?
Le 23/03/2022 à 19:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Great, thanks Gil!
Le 23/03/2022 à 18:15, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
We have some production server based on 18.12, with java 11.
It is working fine.
Gil
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:58:25PM
Great, thanks Gil!
Le 23/03/2022 à 18:15, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
We have some production server based on 18.12, with java 11.
It is working fine.
Gil
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 05:58:25PM +0100, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
BTW,
Is there someone who is already using Java 11
BTW,
Is there someone who is already using Java 11 with 18.12?
TIA
Jacques
Le 23/03/2022 à 16:24, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
I don't remember clearly why I had that in mind. I have just tried to run
current 18.12 with Java 11 and so far it seems OK. I'll check that better
.
Jacques
Le 18/03/2022 à 12:55, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
I suggest to tackle that, including the necessary on the VM, when we will
effectively switch 22.01 to JDK 11
Jacques
Le 18/03/2022 à 12:03, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
should we not also have a VM supporting Java 11
Welcome Nicola and Giulio :)
Jacques
Le 22/03/2022 à 09:30, Gil Portenseigne a écrit :
Congratulations, Welcome !
Gil
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
The OFBiz PMC has invited Nicola Mazzoni and Giulio Speri as new
committers and we are glad to announce
Hi,
This needs more information, not a big deal anyway.
1. I forgot the Jira issue number, it's for OFBIZ-12097 "Date picker not initialised
in ajax-called form ". I fixed that.
2. The macro in Html*MacroLibrary.ftl files should all have the same
signatures, right? I had a doubt because for
of the specifications
Thanks,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 18.03.22 um 11:46 schrieb Jacques Le Roux:
Hi,
Good news, demos will soon be back :).
Greg asked me to provide specs for a new OFBIZ-VM, I guess OFBIZ-VM4.
If nobody is against Monday I'll ask for the same than OFBIZ-VM3
Hi,
Good news, demos will soon be back :).
Greg asked me to provide specs for a new OFBIZ-VM, I guess OFBIZ-VM4.
If nobody is against Monday I'll ask for the same than OFBIZ-VM3 (JDK 8, 8GB
RAM, letsencrypt). I guess it will be Ubuntu again.
JDK8 because it will still need to support 18.12
4fa50c87b708d0445b86af6d2062d336e543c971
Author: Jacques Le Roux
AuthorDate: Tue Feb 15 07:54:17 2022 +0100
Improved: Create a deny list to reject webshell tokens (OFBIZ-12324)
After reviewing https://github.com/nsacyber/Mitigating-Web-Shells this mostly
adds as tokens the "Linux applications commonly
Le 12/02/2022 à 11:48, jler...@apache.org a écrit :
Fixed: CLONE - [SECURITY] Upgrade Tika to 1.28.1 (OFBIZ-12573)
Simpler for now, later OFBIZ 12573 needs to be done
Here I meant OFBIZ 12572 (ie upgrade Tika to 2.3.0
Jacques
, you stated:
* Adds "https://ofbiz.apache.org/> since
2008 (without privileges)
Proud contributor to the ASF since 2006
*Apache Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
Anyone could have been you, whereas I've always been anyone.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:06 PM Jacques
d have been you, whereas I've always been anyone.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:06 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Hi Pierre,
How is your question related?
Le 04/02/2022 à 12:53, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Wasn't there PHP code in the scrum application/ component to work with a
git repository?
O
Message transféré
Sujet : Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] mbrohl commented on pull request
#498: Improved: WorkEffort - MainActionMenu (OFBIZ-12557)
Date : Fri, 4 Feb 2022 11:01:16 +0100
De :Jacques Le Roux
Répondre à :memb...@apache.org
Pour : memb...@apache.org
Hi Pierre
Commit b0b02034eecf8d18ac7ea12f34469ec511269fa0 in ofbiz-framework's
branch refs/heads/trunk from Jacques Le Roux
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=ofbiz-framework.git;h=b0b0203 ]
Fixed: Remote Code Execution (File Upload) Vulnerability (OFBIZ-11948)
Lion Tree has reported us that
"CV
ibed below
commit 8a9596be849f6709cb17c24a598c4862e8df867c
Author: Jacques Le Roux
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 16 08:51:03 2022 +0100
Improved: no functional change, labels improvements
In French, and maybe other languages, there is not only one word for
new.
There are nouveau (masculine), nouvelle (fé
es Jacques, I revert my local fix commit, you gone faster than me.
What can I do for help, to escape any collision with you ?
Nicolas
On 03/02/2022 10:02, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 03/02/2022 à 09:54,jler...@apache.org a écrit :
Improved: no functional change, adds a BuildBot badge (I
Le 03/02/2022 à 09:54, jler...@apache.org a écrit :
Improved: no functional change, adds a BuildBot badge (INFRA-22807)
It works locally (once you have installed Ruby, asciidoctor and
asciidoctor-diagram). CHecking that it's also OK on BuildBot, let's see
result
[1].
Michael
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/93ptk5nfrf2pjfwnl6ovm0lc6l42yb85
Am 03.02.22 um 08:18 schrieb Pierre Smits:
Good to see that the two of you confirm that cleanup can be combined with
other improvements .
Op do 3 feb. 2022 07:15 schreef Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.l
f867c
Author: Jacques Le Roux
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 16 08:51:03 2022 +0100
Improved: no functional change, labels improvements
In French, and maybe other languages, there is not only one word for
new.
There are nouveau (masculine), nouvelle (féminine) and nouvel
(masculine followed
Le 27/01/2022 à 15:57, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Playing the 'blame' game is detrimental to the success of the project, and
thus to all using, contributing, making a living with...
Hi Pierre,
It seems you don't understand why I put "is broken by" references from and in Jiras and
GH. It's not at
Tomcat from 9.0.54 to 9.0.58 (OFBIZ-12539)
6ed30b7 is described below
commit 6ed30b76652e24162bcbc6efe4ca912ba0e31bc2
Author: Jacques Le Roux
AuthorDate: Wed Jan 26 12:31:50 2022 +0100
Fixed: Upgrade Tomcat from 9.0.54 to 9.0.58 (OFBIZ-12539)
The fix for bug CVE-2020-9484 introduced a t
à 16:48, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
OK then, I don't need PMC approval to report a bug to Infra. Not sure though
that Infra will consider it a bug, let's see
Jacques
Le 25/01/2022 à 14:53, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Forwarded to the dev@ofbiz mailing list of OFBiz for those community
members
e Directory <https://directory.apache.org>, PMC Member*
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 2:23 PM Jacques Le Roux (Jira)
Comments on Commits in Github must go to a mailing list of the project
--
Key: OFBIZ-12534
now.
Jacopo
On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:57 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Better, I'll use https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/
Le 21/01/2022 à 09:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
As we prefer to advertise about R18 than 17.12.09, I picked
The Apache OFBiz Project Team would like to inform you that OFBiz 17.12.09
is the last release of the 17.12 branch, which has reached its end of life and
won't be longer officially supported.
https://ofbiz.apache.org/release-notes-17.12.09.html
This announcement takes place on 2022-01-21 and
Better, I'll use https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/
Le 21/01/2022 à 09:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
As we prefer to advertise about R18 than 17.12.09, I picked
https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/apache-ofbiz-17.12.09.zip and will resend
the announce.
Mark Thomas should let it pass
Hi,
As we prefer to advertise about R18 than 17.12.09, I picked
https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/apache-ofbiz-17.12.09.zip and will resend
the announce.
Mark Thomas should let it pass.
Jacques
Le 20/01/2022 à 20:22, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
We could also use modified https
We could also use modified https://ofbiz.apache.org/release-notes-17.12.09.html
(a bit more work...)
Le 20/01/2022 à 20:19, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Jacopo,
The announce was refused (moderated) because there is no direct link to
download 17.12.09 in the announce.
I found we could use
Hi Jacopo,
The announce was refused (moderated) because there is no direct link to
download 17.12.09 in the announce.
I found we could use
https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/apache-ofbiz-17.12.09.zip. Is that correct,
and enough?
TIA
Jacques
Le 20/01/2022 à 17:08, jler...@apache.org a
Done
Le 14/01/2022 à 18:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
If nobody is against I'll remove this file Monday. Note that it will still be
available in Git history/log...
Jacques
Le 09/01/2022 à 09:17, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
But if we don't do anything about it, why keep this misleading
301 - 400 of 24456 matches
Mail list logo
