I don't think so
Jacques
Le 09/05/2014 11:57, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Is there a JIRA issue for this?
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Jul 9,
Is there a JIRA issue for this?
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:12 AM, BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net wrote:
Yes the datamodel
BJ,
the existing data model (as it is described in the Data Model Resource Book as
you have mentioned previously) already takes care of this and I am not planning
to change this.
My proposal was related to the agreements picked for an order.
Jacopo
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:59 AM, BJ Freeman
Scott, Adam, BJ,
thanks for your feedback.
Based on your comments we will probably need also an AgreementOrderApplPurpose
(or Type) entity so that we could have an agreement that governs the terms and
prices applied to a customer, the commissions due to a sales rep etc... (unless
we just rely
Yes the datamodel that I referenced for partyrelationships is in Ofbiz.
However there is no supporting code that creates a partyreleationship
between the Company and Party with role of customer and
partyrelationshiptype of Customer.(CUSTOMER_REL)
So the queries I mentions will not return a list
Thanks Scott,
the link was indeed useful.
I like the plan of creating the AgreementOrderAppl entity, because it will be
definitely very flexible.
However the existing order code (ui and business logic) is based on the
assumption that one agreement is associated to a cart/order, and I would like
I have the implementation that uses the Sales agreement and a
productaggreemt for retail, wholesale, custom.
so as you think though the changes you might want to consider hooks to
allow this in future.
also the agreements are based on partyID role of customeras a
relationship with the company
Hi Jacopo,
I have to admit to not being a big fan of the primary* pattern, for example in
the Shipment entity I really feel it has done nothing except cause us to take
shortcuts when writing shipping logic. In terms of an Agreement or even a
Shipment, what does it actually mean to be the
Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Jacopo,
I have to admit to not being a big fan of the primary* pattern, for example
in the Shipment entity I really feel it has done nothing except cause us to
take shortcuts when writing shipping logic. In terms of an Agreement or even
a Shipment, what does it
how will you get all the companies role of agreements for a particular
party that has a partyrelationship of customer?
how will you get all the Sales agreements for a partyrelationship of
customer with the company under the role of agreements?
BJ Freeman sent the following on 7/7/2010 10:19
yes, I will do.
Jacopo
On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it?
Thanks
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book.
since most told me that features were not
Hi Jacopo,
Not sure if this is of any use to you:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/orders-and-contracts-td2248364.html#a2248394
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 3/07/2010, at 6:24 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
yes, I will do.
Jacopo
On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:01 PM,
I did not relate and order directly with an agreement so that the order
terms were free to me changed on the spot so to speak.
These are know as exceptions and need to be approved, like say in a
retail establishment where a manager has to approve anything not based
on the rules.
the also
When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will
govern the orders (OrderTerms are cloned from AgreementTerms, if the agreement
has a price list then the agreement prices are used in place of ProductPrice);
however the agreementId is only added to the cart but it is
Quick answer: I can't see any problems with that as they are no ways to
retrieve the agreementId from the OrderTerms.
Jacques
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com
When an order is initiated, it is possible to select an agreement that will govern the orders (OrderTerms are
Interesting, so you enhanced the OOTB model and actions, right?
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
I used the model on page 146
and the example agreementID 10002
since the Agreement has the product agreement, the service matches the product agreement productID and updates the
never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book.
since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed
them.
Since most of my discussion were ignored I just made my own, using the
OOTB as a basis.
I use what I can of the svn and add on top the way I see it.
Pretty logical, I see. Maybe Jacopo will consider it?
Thanks
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
never saw it as enhanced only following the Data model book.
since most told me that features were not complete in ofbiz, I completed
them.
Since most of my discussion were ignored I
thanks it would be nice if ofbiz was more based on the Data model book.
in my opinion some of the shortcuts have really crippled it.
=
BJ Freeman
http://bjfreeman.elance.com
Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation
19 matches
Mail list logo
