[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4802) Help screens in Manufacturing

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281425#comment-13281425 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4802: Jacopo, yes, of course, I reviewed the

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4869) Help screens in Humanres

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4869. -- Resolution: Duplicate OFBIZ-2219 Help screens in Humanres

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4869) Help screens in Humanres

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281427#comment-13281427 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4869 at 5/23/12 6:49 AM:

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4868) Help OFBiz Help-day 2012

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4868?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4868. -- Resolution: Duplicate Fix Version/s: (was: Release 11.04.01)

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4802) Help screens in Manufacturing

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281425#comment-13281425 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4802 at 5/23/12 6:51 AM:

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4802) Help screens in Manufacturing

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281435#comment-13281435 ] Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-4802: -- I knew that there was the risk of

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4802) Help screens in Manufacturing

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281440#comment-13281440 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4802: Indeed, you were right from the start

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-3913) Automated action triggered by event

2012-05-23 Thread Olivier Heintz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13281446#comment-13281446 ] Olivier Heintz commented on OFBIZ-3913: --- This requirement comes from end users who

Fwd: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability

2012-05-23 Thread Adrian Crum
Original Message Subject: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:00:48 +0200 From: Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org Reply-To: Commons Developers List d...@commons.apache.org To:

Re: Fwd: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability

2012-05-23 Thread Adam Heath
And which ofbiz versions use commons/bzip2? Might have to check catalina, jetty, etc. On 05/23/2012 11:07 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: Original Message Subject: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability Date: Wed, 23

Re: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Yeah I got it earlier today too and I was in fact working on the upgrade Thanks Jacopo On May 23, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: Original Message Subject: [CVE-2012-2098] Apache Commons Compress and Apache Ant denial of service vulnerability Date: Wed, 23

Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
I just realized that line 150 in DBCPConnectionFactory: factory.setValidationQuery(select example_type_id from example_type limit 1); is a dependency on ExampleType entity declared in the example component. This is probably not a big deal but now that we have moved the example component to

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Adam Heath
On 05/23/2012 11:51 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: I just realized that line 150 in DBCPConnectionFactory: factory.setValidationQuery(select example_type_id from example_type limit 1); is a dependency on ExampleType entity declared in the example component. This is probably not a big

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On May 23, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Adam Heath wrote: 1) modify the sql to use SequenceValueItem or another entity declared in the same component (or, less ideally, another framework component like commons) DBCPConnectionFactory is in framework/entity; having it require a

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Adam Heath
On 05/23/2012 12:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: DBCPConnectionFactory is in framework/entity; having it require a framework/entity/entitymodel seems the safest approach. I agree; what if we use: select count(testing_type_id) from testing_type where testing_type_id = 'ABC' Actually, no,

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On May 23, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote: On 05/23/2012 12:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: DBCPConnectionFactory is in framework/entity; having it require a framework/entity/entitymodel seems the safest approach. I agree; what if we use: select count(testing_type_id) from

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Jacques Le Roux
From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com On May 23, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Adam Heath wrote: On 05/23/2012 12:05 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: DBCPConnectionFactory is in framework/entity; having it require a framework/entity/entitymodel seems the safest approach. I agree;

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Adam Heath
On 05/23/2012 01:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Using count() was simply a trick to be sure to get a record back even if the entity is empty... but if we use an entity that we are sure is populated we don't have to use it, of course. Of course if we use count(*) we have to use it in an

Re: Dependency of DBCPConnectionFactory on ExampleType entity

2012-05-23 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On May 23, 2012, at 9:25 PM, Adam Heath wrote: On 05/23/2012 01:13 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Using count() was simply a trick to be sure to get a record back even if the entity is empty... but if we use an entity that we are sure is populated we don't have to use it, of course. Of