Re: Vetting & Testing Contributor’s Code Changes

s on Github. > In that past, and still to date, any code contribution uploaded to a Jira > ticket needed to be downloaded by a committer and applied by him to a test > branch (based on either the master or the active release branches) in order > to vet the code changes and test the code chan

Vetting & Testing Contributor’s Code Changes

. This vetting and testing was and is an arduous and time consuming task, especially when the handed code changes span multiple components, languages and/or files. The committer must vet the changes with in his mind: - does it have unnecessary whitespacing - does it comply with checkstyle

[POC Vue.Js] Party as a usable testing environment

are a lot of functionality working, but still some other one, not yet operational. Next step is to have a full automate User Test Scenario to be sure all is operational and usable. There are two testing environments : * ofbiz-selenium[2] used by the continuous integration process and some debug process,

Re: Need feedback and testing

rote: > >> Hello Everyone, >> >> I have a big patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8337 >> >> This is a major refactoring of the Start and Base components to >> substantially simplify and cleanup the startup sequence. All tests are >> passing but further testing and feedback would be great. >> >> >> >

Re: Need feedback and testing

; substantially simplify and cleanup the startup sequence. All tests are > passing but further testing and feedback would be great. > > >

Re: Need feedback and testing

testing and feedback would be great. Hi Taher, I reviewed this morning, all seems nice and dandy Jacques

Need feedback and testing

Hello Everyone, I have a big patch in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-8337 This is a major refactoring of the Start and Base components to substantially simplify and cleanup the startup sequence. All tests are passing but further testing and feedback would be great.

Re: Help required for testing the integration with Freemarker

Fantastic work, thank you Jacopo. I looked at the code and I like the new method signatures better in the worker. I will try to test it and see if I stumble upon anything. On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi all, > > in rev.

Help required for testing the integration with Freemarker

Hi all, in rev. 1762227 I have cleaned up and modified several methods to better leverage the Freemarker API and remove some of the unnecessary dependencies on FM. Please refer to the commit log for details. While I did my best to make sure that the new code works fine, and I have introduced a

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

I think that your point was well received. I am just happy that testing is getting attention. Ron On 19/07/2016 7:53 PM, Scott Gray wrote: I'm not looking for any sort of response really. I was just speaking in favor of integration tests because I think they provide better coverage

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

re.com> wrote: > It is not clear what you are expecting as a specific response. > > As you move up the food chain, the definition of "units" changes and the > tests get more complicated and the design of the tests gets more complex > (mock objects, testing race conditions).

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

It is not clear what you are expecting as a specific response. As you move up the food chain, the definition of "units" changes and the tests get more complicated and the design of the tests gets more complex (mock objects, testing race conditions). It is hard to make specific comm

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

position might decrease the further up >>>> >>> the >>> >>>> stack we move with them. I'm not against unit tests when they prove >>>> useful, but further up the stack I think we should prove the case for >>>> >>> them >&

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

bucket. I could be wrong, but I think it's worth looking into before we declare that unit tests are the best form of testing for OFBiz. Regards Scott On 19 July 2016 at 17:37, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Scott, Thank you for the feedback. To be focused exactly on inte

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

de to the community. I think there's a chance attempting > > to mock service tests could fall into that bucket. I could be wrong, > but I > > think it's worth looking into before we declare that unit tests are the > > best form of testing for OFBiz. > > > > Regard

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

vide to the community. I think there's a chance attempting > to mock service tests could fall into that bucket. I could be wrong, but I > think it's worth looking into before we declare that unit tests are the > best form of testing for OFBiz. > > Regards > Scott > > On 19 July

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

quire more effort to maintain than the value they provide to the community. I think there's a chance attempting to mock service tests could fall into that bucket. I could be wrong, but I think it's worth looking into before we declare that unit tests are the best form of testing for OFBiz. Reg

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

of the screen in between test cycles thus giving me immediate feedback on any errors I made. Perhaps my intro was too long so this is the squeezed out version of it. I already had one round of testing in the start component which was much faster that way and had an immediate impact. Oh and by the way, you

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

for TDD. I'm not sure if I missed any other points raised regarding integration vs. unit tests? I'm not looking to start a big long debate on the topic, I just wanted to speak out that someone out there (me) doesn't think unit tests are the best solution for testing OFBiz applications. Regards Scott

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

tests then you will come down to a screeching halt as you wait between these test cycles. My computer actually takes 10 minutes or more for a full clean load data and testing. Now talking about mocking you raise some interesting points, what can you mock vs utilizing integration tests

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

You are probably right that integration testing has a lot more value. However, unit tests are still useful in their own right and may encourage people to write smaller classes that can be tested easily. As you point out, integration testing can be done at several levels with mock

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

closer to the real world scenarios the application might encounter. I don't really see how unit tests could be applied to non-framework testing in a useful manner, could you expand on your vision in that regard? I mean would we be testing something smaller than a service as the 'unit'? What would we

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

egards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I faced a big problem in designing the testing

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-7254) provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz

in OFBIZ-7897. Thus we can consider this JIRA done > provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7254 >

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

w tests running and this is very doable. But I faced a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. The problem The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are very complex. A master file calls other files which call other files. And in the middle you have external

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

code and production code. So for example: Production code: framework/start/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/start Test code: framework/start/src/test/java/org/apache/ofbiz/base/start The benefit of this hierarchy is that you can access non-public (package protected) methods for testing

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

lidingfilame...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I > > faced > > > a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. > > &

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

; > > I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I > faced > > a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. > > > > The problem > > > > The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are ver

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-7254) provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz

the framework :) Just 8 lines of code now enable unit tests in OFBiz. > provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz > -- > > Key: OFBIZ-7254 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7254 >

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

oblem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. > > The problem > > The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are very complex. A master > file calls other files which call other files. And in the middle you have > external libraries (ant-contrib) and m

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

But I faced > a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. > > The problem > > The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are very complex. A master > file calls other files which call other files. And in the middle you have > external libraries (

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

ery doable. But I faced a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. The problem The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are very complex. A master file calls other files which call other files. And in the middle you have external libraries (ant-cont

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

some cleanups regardless. Thanks, Jacopo On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I faced a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. The prob

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I faced > a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. > > The problem > > The way the build scripts

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

Hello Everyone, I was able to get a few tests running and this is very doable. But I faced a big problem in designing the testing framework because of ANT. The problem The way the build scripts are designed in OFBiz are very complex. A master file calls other files which call

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

gt; -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Mridul Pathak > > Senior Manager > > HotWax Systems > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > > > On Jun 8, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > &g

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-7254) provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz

Taher Alkhateeb created OFBIZ-7254: -- Summary: provide a new unit testing framework for OFBiz Key: OFBIZ-7254 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-7254 Project: OFBiz Issue Type

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

ax Systems > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > > > On Jun 8, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base > > component I rea

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

component and while starting on the base > component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You > cannot do real test driven development or red-green-refactor with the > current setup, hence my proposal to change it. I explain be

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

oring the start component and while starting on the base > component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You > cannot do real test driven development or red-green-refactor with the > current setup, hence my proposal to change it. I explain below: > &g

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

ific test Suite from a component:* >>>> >>>> ant run-single-test-suite -Dtest.component=‘order’ -Dtest.suiteName=' >>>> ordertests' >>>> >>>> *Running a test case from a component:* >>>> >>>> java -jar ofbiz.jar -test -

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You cannot do real test driven development or red-green-refactor with the current setup, hence my proposal to change it. I explain below: Problem w

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

but just want to confirm and understand > your > > proposal. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pranay Pandey > > HotWax Systems > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > > slidingfilame...@g

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

nt=‘order’ -Dtest.suiteName=' > > > ordertests' > > > > > > *Running a test case from a component:* > > > > > > java -jar ofbiz.jar -test -component='order' -case='salesOrder-test' > > > > > > I may be completely wrong here but just want to c

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

but just want to confirm and understand > your > > proposal. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Pranay Pandey > > HotWax Systems > > http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > > slidingfilame...@g

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You cannot do real test driven development or red-green-refactor with the current setup, hence my proposal to change it. I explain below: Problem with current design - What we have right now is not unit

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

t; On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb < > slidingfilame...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base > > component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. >

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

That sounds like a more than reasonable proposition to me + 1 Jacques Le 08/06/2016 à 11:11, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : Hello Everyone, After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You cannot do

Re: Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Taher Alkhateeb <slidingfilame...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base > component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. Yo

Proposal to modify the testing framework for OFBiz

Hello Everyone, After refactoring the start component and while starting on the base component I realized that the testing framework for OFBiz is not good. You cannot do real test driven development or red-green-refactor with the current setup, hence my proposal to change it. I explain below

Re: Help in testing big refactor in Start component OFBIZ-6783

Le 11/05/2016 à 13:23, Taher Alkhateeb a écrit : - All commands now have a unified method of calling. For example java -jar ofbiz.jar --load-data delegator=default --load-data file=somefile.xml --portoffset 10 That would not work :p (kidding ;)) Tests result at the Jira, WIP...

Help in testing big refactor in Start component OFBIZ-6783

Hello Everyone, Blurry vision, big headache, and unhealthy amounts of coffee, but I finally have a patch that works on ofbiz and passes all tests. However, this patch requires thorough testing to ensure that we did not introduce any new bugs. The patch essentially changes most

Re: testing

It does not work this way, please check https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html Jacques Le 18/04/2016 13:16, Gerd Güldenast a écrit : unsubscribe

testing

unsubscribe

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-2100) Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application

Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application Key: OFBIZ-2100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: New Feature

[jira] [Assigned] (OFBIZ-2100) Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pierre Smits reassigned OFBIZ-2100: --- Assignee: Pierre Smits Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-2100) Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sharan Foga updated OFBIZ-2100: --- Sprint: Bug Crush Event - 21/2/2015 Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-5468) Setup separate branch and related CI testing instance

testing instance - Key: OFBIZ-5468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5468 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Sub-task Components: ALL COMPONENTS, framework

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-2100) Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application

up since 2009 we should close this issue. Survey Implementation for testing scenarios of ecommerce application Key: OFBIZ-2100 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2100

Re: Please help testing the Tomcat connector configuration in the trunk

Hi Jacopo, We have tested ajp connector and it seem to be working fine. Thanks Regards --- Arun Patidar On Thursday 18 September 2014 02:37 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, a few minutes ago with the commit below I have cleaned up the Tomcat connector configuration for the http, https

Re: Please help testing the Tomcat connector configuration in the trunk

Thank you Arun, much appreciated! Jacopo On Sep 19, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Arun Patidar arun.pati...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote: Hi Jacopo, We have tested ajp connector and it seem to be working fine. Thanks Regards --- Arun Patidar On Thursday 18 September 2014 02:37 PM, Jacopo Cappellato

Please help testing the Tomcat connector configuration in the trunk

Hi all, a few minutes ago with the commit below I have cleaned up the Tomcat connector configuration for the http, https and ajp connectors. In theory the settings should be the same as before (apart for the max number of processing threads that is now larger because it is set to the default

Re: FreeMarker 2.3.21 Release Candidate 1 is out for testing

Thank you Daniel, I have committed 2.3.21-rc01 to the OFBiz trunk today and we will let you know if we face any issues. Jacopo On Sep 1, 2014, at 1:16 AM, Daniel Dekany ddek...@freemail.hu wrote: The final 2.3.21 is expected to come out in early or mid October. If you can, please use

[jira] [Reopened] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reopened OFBIZ-4794: This is now complete set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4794. -- Resolution: Fixed set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-1670) JUnit test for testing Project permission

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-1670. Resolution: Later JUnit test for testing Project permission

[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-5468) Setup separate branch and related CI testing instance

Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-5468: --- Summary: Setup separate branch and related CI testing instance Key: OFBIZ-5468 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5468 Project: OFBiz Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

a small change to allow to use the portoffset paramter with the run-tests target, this is for OFBiz-Sonar: INFRA-3590 set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

and WebSite entity in trunk r1549015 R13.07 r1549016+1549019 set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

# To simultaneously run the demos without having to change much things each time we deploy new releases, just one parameter (this will need to have the same commited in R13.07... to be discussed...) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

of INFRA-6790, so we have trunk: r1525909+1526533 R13.07: r1525910+1526534 R12.04: r1525910+1526535 R11.04: r1525907+1526536 set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

was (Author: jacques.le.roux): I completed previous commits because of INFRA-6790, so we have trunk: r1525909+1526533 R13.07: r1525910+1526534 R12.04: r1525910+1526535 R11.04: r1525907+1526536 set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for trunk and R13.07 (R12.04 and R11.04 have only fails no errors). I will revert and continue locally... set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

at revisions: 1525907 + 1526536 set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

Note to myself: a non functional change to ReportScreens.xml had slipped in at r1525906. It should not be carried in next time... set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

patches was not enough. I need to explain what I did. It's finally few small changes. I put much care in them and made a lot of testing. *What's for?* OOTB the port offset is interesting in at least 3 cases: # To simultaneously run tests on the same Buildbot machine. This is related to this [thread

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for the testSOAPSimpleService error set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

and trunk. But I juts realise that [R11.04 tests failed last time|http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch11/builds/99/steps/compile_1/logs/stdio] seems related to ofbizssl.jks missing. I did not reproduce that locally so hopefully it's OK. set different ports for testing in a CI

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

though it must be related. If someone could also test it and have a look it would be great. set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

and R13.07 tests simultaneously I get the same Transaction Timeout error for SOAPSimpleService on both sides. I certainly ran 12.04 with 11.04, and maybe because 11.04 tests are far less numerous I did not cross this issue. set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components

[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

issues, I have fixed one, resolving the other set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

Release Branch 11.04 I want to backport this to releases to facilitate things on Buildbot. Else it has much less interest. I will attach the patches for each. set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4794: --- Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-4794-test-ports.patch) set different ports for testing

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-4794: --- Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-4794 - test port.patch) set different ports for testing

[jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

- R13.07.patch OFBIZ-4794 - test port - R12.04.patch OFBIZ-4794 - test port - R11.04.patch set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) -- Key: OFBIZ-4794

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 1:24 AM Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) x-store-info:Ru8Mzrcu9Bi87krfImffoGU6zyI7zQxEZz9YeuslXAJOVdMeHzx51QGS+h0mQKu+uNKB1KcxjEz3VUO0aKUYQVwEi1laac014UI1fiPODhWY7HffMbGCyRhyKQvhHi

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) On 21/07/2013 08:58, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Infra team, Douglas can't unsubscribe his sirdouglasc...@hotmail.com mailto:sirdouglasc...@hotmail.com email address from OFBiz dev ML dev

RE: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

: jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com To: sirdouglasc...@hotmail.com CC: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:45:36 +0200 Then maybe you just have to unregister from Jira Since

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

19, 2013 1:01 AM Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) only JIRA so how do I stop emails from JIRA? Many thanks as I know this isn't your job... but.. the alternative is to subscribe to all get answer

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

in 1st place, and I'm unfraid we have not the manpower to handle more... Jacques - Original Message - From: SirDouglas Cook To: Jacques Le Roux Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:01 AM Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI

Re: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins)

... Jacques - Original Message - From: SirDouglas Cook To: Jacques Le Roux Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:01 AM Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4794) set different ports for testing in a CI environment (e.g. Jenkins) only JIRA so how do I stop emails from JIRA

  1   2   3   >