To be totally honest, I loathe the github issue tracker, whereas I feel that
Trac has treated us pretty darn well so far in that regard.
We can set up some kind of Git commit hook that automatically clones the Git
repo when new code is checked in, and then checks that into the SVN repo behind
On Jun 17, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Tim Schaub wrote:
In adding the WMTS layer, I created a constructor that takes a single
argument. If others agree that this is the way forward, I think there
is sense in getting used to it before 3.0.
I am bringing this up here because Chris objected to my
+1
Thanks, Bart
* On 4-May-2010 at 12:46AM EDT, bart...@osgis.nl said:
Since the 2.9 release was done 2 regressions have been found, as well as 2
documentation errors. These have been fixed in trunk and pulled up to the
2.9 branch. See also:
On Apr 23, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Erik Uzureau wrote:
Anyways, it isn't goodbye it's see you later, so no drama necessary. Thanks
to everyone for putting up with me and helping me out all these years.
OpenLayers is a fantastic piece of software and I'm honored to be a line or
two in its short
+1 sounds good to me! thanks again!
On Apr 20, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
Hi list,
after 2.9RC3 was issued last Thursday no issues have been raised, so
therefore I want to call for a vote on the release of OpenLayers 2.9.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Bart
On Apr 16, 2010, at 7:37 PM, christopher.schm...@nokia.com
christopher.schm...@nokia.com wrote:
I'm interested mainly to hear if people are generally in favor or
opposed to the idea of a repository move - and a move specifically to
GitHub for hosting.
I am not in favor of moving to Git,
Actually, this is kind of a relief for me, too -- the translation
folks have submitted another set of i18n-only patches. Can I go ahead
and commit them for the next RC?
SDE
* On 14-Apr-2010 at 7:45AM EDT, Bart van den Eijnden said:
Hi Pierre,
don't worry, fate has decided on another RC :-)
+1 with gratitude to everyone who's contributed to the 2.9 release. Great work!
SDE
On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
Hi list,
since OpenLayers 2.9RC2 has been released one issue has been fixed (wrt the
KML format), which was clearly a regression from OL 2.8, see
w00t! +1
* On 8-Apr-2010 at 3:04AM EDT, bart...@osgis.nl said:
Hi list,
I would like to call for a vote on a second release candidate (RC2) for
OpenLayers 2.9.
4 tickets have been pulled up (2561, 2562, 2563 and 2564), I've verified
all tests still pass in IE6 and FF 3.6.2, so all is
On Tuesday, March 23, 2010, Bart van den Eijnden bart...@osgis.nl wrote:
Hi,
with all the milestone 2.9 tickets now closed, I'd like to start the
release procedure (as documented in [*]).
Are PSC members ok with that? Please vote. As always everyone is invited to
give opinion.
+1, with
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 07:38 +0200, Eric Lemoine wrote:
I'd be +1 on using x.y for both types of releases. Choosing to do a
big or small release could be done based on a number of things:
disruptive patches were included? no big release for too long? etc.
I've always said that version numbers
Question: any reason we shouldn't just use OSM tiles instead?
Perhaps this is an excuse for me to finally implement TMS proxying in
TileCache...
SDE
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 11:02 -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 05:34:35PM -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:51 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I think Bart has been a longstanding member of the community, and has
continued to provide good patches and feedback. In order to help him
participate more easily in the community, I recommend we make Bart a
committer on the
+1! hooray!
SDE
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:07 +0200, Andreas Hocevar wrote:
+1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Christopher
Schmidtcrschm...@metacarta.com wrote:
I'm in favor of making RC6 final. All in favor?
+1
Regards,
--
Christopher Schmidt
MetaCarta
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 16:07 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I'd like to propose that once Andreas commits #1910, we roll on 2.8 RC6,
in hopes that it's our last our RC.
Roll away! And thanks again to everyone who's contributed to this
release candidate. +1
SDE
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 21:02 +0100, Ian Mayo wrote:
Does anybody here know how metacarta produce this WMS layer? I'm
familiar with VPF, but a google search indicates that the GeoServer
VPF implementation is a little dodgy - so I presume they're either not
using GeoServer or not using the
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:22 +0100, Robert Leverington wrote:
I am writing to ask if there is anyone (preferably a core developer)
who would be willing to liaise with me and the other Translatewiki.net
staff to assist us in providing a localisation for OpenLayers. Nearly
all of the work can be
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 22:25 +0100, Robert Leverington wrote:
- Schuyler will be notified and commit the changes to the trunk
repository.
Question on this point for the OpenLayers team: Can we treat
localization commits like docs and test patches and commit them to trunk
without the whole
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 16:59 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
As 2.8 Release Manager, and 24 hours without any new bugs, I officially
say that it seems like it's round about time for a 2.8 RC1.
All in favor?
starting off with a +1 from yours truly,
+1 and applause for everyone who worked
On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 19:45 -0600, Tim Schaub wrote:
Hey-
I'm hoping to get a favor. I'd like someone to review the latest patch
for http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/1951.
r9022 introduced a regression that breaks bounds.intersectsBounds.
It looks like I got overzealous in my attempts
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:55 -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I'm happy to throw my name in for the PSC Chair position. And I also
like the idea of having term limits to encourage circulation. (And if
someone else wants the upcoming shift more, I will gladly wait.)
I, for one,
On Tue, 2008-12-16 at 11:44 -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:31:22PM +0100, Bouiaw wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have your advice about implementing openlayers in
ActionScript3. From my point of view, combining OpenLayers class model,
ActionScript3 power, AMF3
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 09:15 +1100, Cameron Shorter wrote:
I'd also like to bring out into open discussion the question of who we
have on the committee, what are the expectations of them. Whether we
only want technical people on the committee or whether non-coders should
be included too.
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 20:09 -0500, Dave McIlhagga wrote:
... think of this as a small
way in which OpenLayers can help sustain the broader foundation we
collectively benefit from.
I agree with Dave on this. I think that OSGeo membership is a net win
for OpenLayers, and I think that the
On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 09:25 -0500, Schuyler Erle wrote:
Thanks for the discussion on this point. Do we want to do anything about
the docs as such that are already in SVN?
Sorry, note to self: *don't* post to mailing lists before coffee.
I *meant*: given that we have fragments of documentation
On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 14:14 -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
John has raised questions about having the OSGeo manage our
sponsorship
program versus having some other entity manage the program. I think
we
have agreed to treat this question separately - to entertain
suggestions
on
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 12:39 -0700, Tim Schaub wrote:
If we agree to pursue sponsorship for OpenLayers via the OSGeo Project
Sponsorship program, the PSC believes that the sponsorship document
referenced [1] adequately describes the goals, intended uses, and
potential benefits of project
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 06:13 -0500, John R. Frank wrote:
Good point. Fixed?
Much better, thanks -- I think that reads a lot more clearly. +1
SDE
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@openlayers.org
http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 05:57 -0500, John R. Frank wrote:
4) Make OpenLayers the most powerful web mapping toolkit available by
enhancing the library.
Maybe I am goalizing too much :-)
I sort of feel like the superlatives make the goals seem a bit
grandiose, and distract somewhat from the
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 07:22 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I have seen no cases I'm aware of where the PSC has completely ignored
a
request, or even, generally speaking, acted against the will of the
project, so at this time it seems likely there is a fair amount of
trust in the PSC.
On Sun, 2008-10-12 at 16:16 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
I don't know if I did so successfully, but i've just laid out the pitch
I plan to use on people who I want to be sponsors, if the PSC decides to
go this route: I'd love to hear whether you (or anyone else) thinks the
above reasons
* On 25-Sep-2008 at 1:47PM PDT, Erik Uzureau said:
Can we get a vote on making 2.7rc3 the final release for OL 2.7?
+1. Great job all around. Thanks.
SDE
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@openlayers.org
http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 22:55 -0500, Erik Uzureau wrote:
As always, please voice your opinion on this. We are hoping that
option (3) is a reasonable compromise that will hopefully still allow
us to deliver the new release on time.
I know I've been pretty quiet lately, but I want to speak up in
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 14:39 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:45:00PM -0400, Tim Schaub wrote:
Wondering if others think a move to subversion 1.5 would be good.
It doesn't look like Subversion 1.5 has been backported to Debian Etch
(which is what the OL server
On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 03:26 -0400, Christopher Schmidt wrote:
When someone copies the file named OpenLayers.js and a dir called img/
into some project, it currently has no version number visible.
OpenLayers.VERSION_NUMBER is in the file, and accessible in Javascript
for that reason:
* On 10-Apr-2008 at 12:52AM PDT, Bart van den Eijnden (OSGIS) said:
is anyone going to FOSS4G2008 in Capetown?
Are there plans to do an OpenLayers workshop? I would be interested in
helping out.
FWIW I plan to be there; would be willing to help organize an OL
workshop if needed.
SDE
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 13:45 +0200, Tomas Novotny wrote:
After spending some time reading about sandboxes, tickets, patches and
other OL-dev-kungfu I've tried to create a ticket for my problem:
Thanks for submitting this, Tomas.
We've tried to make the barrier to participation in OpenLayers as
* On 7-Apr-2008 at 11:41AM PDT, Christopher Schmidt said:
I'm +1 on an RC2.
+1, of course. thanks. :)
SDE
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@openlayers.org
http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
* On 7-Apr-2008 at 12:35PM PDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But if I try to solve that panning problem I would do so significant
change that I would be really worried about the rest of the code.
I'm open for discussion about such possible change with OL core
developers but I don't have capacity
* On 2-Nov-2007 at 2:40PM PST, Jachym Cepicky said:
thanks for this comprehensive explanation. I would like only add this
small comment: In GRASS, more then 30 developers do have cvs write
access. It works. People are respecting each other's work, if somebody
breaks something, the change
* On 9-Oct-2007 at 10:53PM PDT, Cameron Shorter said:
+0
(changed to +1 if +0 is considered blocking)
As noted on PSC email lists, I don't like the proliferation of Open
Source licenses. I understand Metacarta's concerns regarding the
ambiguity of the BSD license and think they are
* On 24-Jul-2007 at 12:07AM PDT, Erik Uzureau said:
The ticket is:
http://trac.openlayers.org/ticket/860
And the change (in english) is this:
When we see a key/value pair like this bounds=-180,-90,90,180...
instead of parsing that as:
{ 'bounds': -180,-90,90,180 }
..we'll parse it
42 matches
Mail list logo
