Hey-
Alexandre Dube wrote:
Hi Eric,
Ok, I understand what you mean. But I already set specific scales to
the vector layer that are supposed to give the same resolutions I need.
I mean :
Base layer (map) has scales in its options: [ 10, 5, 25000,
1, 5000, 2500, 1000,
Hi, I'll try to make some little example tomorrow, because I think
there is some strange behavior when you supply resolution array to
vector layer with cluster strategy. Then the problem will be little
bit clearer I guess...
Ivan
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Tim Schaub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok thanks Tim,
I had some trouble at first trying to use
minResolution/maxResolution... But quickly found out that when you want
a layer only visible at a certain reach, you must choose either scale
OR resolution to work with, not both. I was setting maxResolution to
3.527775872778806 but
Hey-
Ivan Grcic wrote:
Hi, I'll try to make some little example tomorrow, because I think
there is some strange behavior when you supply resolution array to
vector layer with cluster strategy. Then the problem will be little
bit clearer I guess...
It was an oversight to have the cluster
Hi Alexandre
If you want your vector layer to be visible only for a subset of the
base layer's resolutions you should set maxResolution and/or
minResolution in your vector layer options.
If you pass an array of resolutions to the vector layer, you can end
up with vectorlayer.resolutions[i] !=
Yup, and i was about to fill this one too :)
Did u fill the ticket allready?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Alexandre Dube [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi devs,
I got a problem using the cluster strategy. At first, it didn't
seemed to work at all. I always got the same number of feature
And i think it might be connected to with
http://www.nabble.com/Cluster-and-Scales-map-options-td20224740.html#a20224740
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Ivan Grcic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup, and i was about to fill this one too :)
Did u fill the ticket allready?
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at
