Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
I started a translation for the release notes as a child page of the
release notes itself
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33295326
But pictures attached to the main release notes page are not displayed on
the child page. Is there any
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Ricardo Berlasso wrote:
I started a translation for the release notes as a child page of the
release notes itself
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=33295326
But pictures attached to the main release notes page are not displayed on
the
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
--
Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Dear all,
The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could
it be added to the release now? ^_^
https://translate.apache.org/zh_TW/aoo40/
On 2013/07/18 02:57, Juergen Schmidt said:
Am Mittwoch, 17. Juli 2013 um 20:31 schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 1:13 PM,
-1 for Traditional Chinese version not included yet.
On 2013/07/18 16:54, Rory O'Farrell said:
+1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
--
Best regards,
imacat ^_*' ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
PGP Key http://www.imacat.idv.tw/me/pgpkey.asc
Woman's Voice News:
On 7/18/13 12:01 PM, imacat wrote:
-1 for Traditional Chinese version not included yet.
Traditional Chinese is not part of the vote, means your vote is
unqualified and not valid. The reason why it is not included is also
known, sorry but this makes no sense.
Juergen
On 2013/07/18 16:54,
j...@apache.org has denied fanyuz...@gmail.com's request for
4.0.0_release_blocker:
Bug 122780: Clicking Insert in dialog Insert Section incorrectly activated by
Edit - paste, causes application hung
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122780
--- Additional Comments from
Hi, all,
I just noticed that the latest user guides we have is for OpenOffice.org
3.3, as below:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOo3_User_Guides
I wonder if any one is willing to help to update the user guides for AOO
4.0?
Thanks!
- Shenfeng (Simon)
On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could
it be added to the release now? ^_^
no, it is too late and I won't do a respin. But I will integrate the
translation on trunk immediately and we can build an unofficial
snapshot
On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could
it be added to the release now? ^_^
no, it is too late and I won't do a respin. But I will integrate the
translation on trunk
Today I woke up to find approximately 15 spam messages to the dev
list, all from the WikiAdmin form. It looks like spammers have found
it.
The signal/noise ratio for this was never good to start with -- maybe
10 misdirected support questions for every legitimate wiki admin
question. But now
We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When
looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two
entirely different approaches to organizing the information:
1) A team-oriented approach, where at the top organizational level
there are parent pages for
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, all,
I just noticed that the latest user guides we have is for OpenOffice.org
3.3, as below:
http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/OOo3_User_Guides
I wonder if any one is willing to help to update the
Alternatively, maybe there is a way to add a CAPTCHA to the form,
preferable one that is impossible to solve ;-)
Seems to be possible like this example:
http://brightbyte.de/mw/index.php?title=Special:Contact
-
To unsubscribe,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate
(RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an
important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes.
The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth
reviewing if you have not looked recently:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes
This is the primary statement of what is in the release. The
introductory sections are general enough that this
Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely
to get an answer.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Singhal, Ankur asing...@ptc.com
Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24 AM
Subject: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the module stlport
To:
Contact page is removed.
Can we please find a way to qualify BZ requests in the future, so we can
avoid triple work (add contact page, move contact page, remove contact
page).
Qualifying request in BZ should make it obvious if its a wish, or something
the community have agreed upon.
rgds
jan I.
2013/7/17 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate
(RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an
important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes.
It is a key milestone to
On 18.07.2013 16:26, Rob Weir wrote:
Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely
to get an answer.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Singhal, Ankur asing...@ptc.com
Date: Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24 AM
Subject: Issue with dmake of AOO-3.4.1 for the
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When
looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two
entirely different approaches
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:31 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Contact page is removed.
Can we please find a way to qualify BZ requests in the future, so we can
avoid triple work (add contact page, move contact page, remove contact
page).
Qualifying request in BZ should make it obvious if
Make sure you are included in our Directory of Volunteers and that the
information is as you want it to appear:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers
This page is linked to (indirectly) from the credits link of the
Help/About dialog box in AOO 4.0. It will
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth
reviewing if you have not looked recently:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes
This is the primary statement of what is in
On 17.07.2013 22:50, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/15/2013 07:06 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 07/15/2013 06:57 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 07/15/2013 10:18 AM, schrieb Andre
On 2013/07/18 19:09, Jürgen Schmidt said:
On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could
it be added to the release now? ^_^
no, it is too late and I won't do a respin. But I will
2013/7/18 imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw
On 2013/07/18 19:09, Jürgen Schmidt said:
On 7/18/13 1:07 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 7/18/13 12:00 PM, imacat wrote:
Dear all,
The translation of Traditional Chinese was finished (100%). Could
it be added to the release now? ^_^
no,
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
The Release Notes are starting to look very nice. It is worth
reviewing if you have not looked recently:
Hi Ankur,
is it correct, that you want to build the version 3.4.1?
Kind regards
Regina
Rob Weir schrieb:
Forwarding to our development mailing list where you are more likely
to get an answer.
-Rob
-- Forwarded message --
From: Singhal, Ankur asing...@ptc.com
Date: Thu, Jul
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When
looking over the current structure it looks like we've been taking two
entirely different approaches to organizing the information:
1) A team-oriented
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.When
looking over the current structure it
janI wrote:
+1
rgds
jan I
On 17 July 2013 09:40, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate
(RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an
important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
We have the opportunity to restructure the pages on our CWiki.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:16 PM, John 73 WA4GPS 73wa4...@sc.rr.com wrote:
In my club membership data base, I can use Filter by Selection to
isolate a group of members that I want to send an E-mail to and, if I click
on the E-mail Address field label, the entire column is highlighted but
when
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net
wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janI
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate
(RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an
important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes.
Who completed the OpenOffice 3.3 Solaris x86 build? It seems that we could
easily add the new vendor to the few files listed here, then recompile. I am
sure someone already has the environment set up considering the code was
compiled for Solaris x86 in the past. This could then become a
No distribution of OpenOffice.org 3.3 was built at Apache OpenOffice. (There
was an out-of-cycle security fix, but that did not require rebuilding the
application. I don't believe that fix was provided for Solaris, however.) The
Apache OpenOffice code base was based on OpenOffice.org code
Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond:
Thanks for responding. Do you know who built the Solaris Intel distributions
posted on this page?
http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/other.html
I am not adverse to rebuilding the code for Solaris 10 x86, but in the
meantime, I am
Thanks and yes, no help!
-Original Message-
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 1:28 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Steele, Raymond
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java 7
Am 07/18/2013 10:14 PM, schrieb Steele, Raymond:
Am 07/18/2013 08:41 PM, schrieb janI:
On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisherdave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM, janIj...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 15:29,
Am 07/18/2013 05:23 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 17.07.2013 22:50, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/15/2013 07:06 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 07/15/2013 06:57 PM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 15.07.2013 18:08, Kay Schenk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
No sure about accuracy.
--
-
MzK
Success is falling nine times and getting up ten.
Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
No sure about accuracy.
Great link, thanks!
Now both can be compared with facts - assumed they are correct. ;-)
Marcus
On 18 July 2013 23:32, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
No sure about accuracy.
Great link, thanks!
Now both can be compared with
The 3.3.0 Releases were all by Oracle on January 18, 2011.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond [mailto:raymond.ste...@lmco.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 01:15 PM
To: dennis.hamil...@acm.org; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: OpenOffice 3.3 and Java
+1
Marcus
Am 07/17/2013 09:40 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi all,
this is a call for vote on releasing the following release candidate
(RC2 revision 1503704) as Apache OpenOffice 4.0. This will be an
important release for Apache OpenOffice with bigger visible UI changes.
It is a key
I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from
non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new
volunteers will want to translate OpenOffice 4.0 into their mother tongue.
Unless we are already covered for a timely creation of accounts, I
volunteer to get
On 18 July 2013 23:31, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 20:12, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Jul 18, 2013, at 9:43 AM, janI wrote:
On 18 July 2013 16:50, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 July 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from
non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new
volunteers will want to translate OpenOffice 4.0 into their mother tongue.
Unless we are
+1Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
On 7/17/2013 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
On 19 July 2013 01:11, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 19 July 2013 00:46, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
I expect an increased traffic of Pootle account requests (from
non-committers) next week, when we will release version 4.0 and new
volunteers will want to translate
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On 18 July 2013 23:32, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/18/2013 11:21 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
In continuing discussions, some of you may be interested in this site:
http://www.wikimatrix.org/
No sure about
+1 (!)
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
+1Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
On 7/17/2013 12:40 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.0
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release
HI Regina,
Yes It's correct I am trying to build Version 3.4.1 which is the latest stable
version.
Thanks and Regards,
Ankur Singhal
-Original Message-
From: Regina Henschel [mailto:rb.hensc...@t-online.de]
Sent: 18 July 2013 22:07
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Singhal, Ankur
58 matches
Mail list logo
