Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/27/2016 3:53 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Carl Marcum
On 03/27/2016 05:01 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting our time. I generally have at least one

Re: Reporting broken download link

2016-03-27 Thread Marcus
Am 03/27/2016 06:18 PM, schrieb natedegrate: Apache quit downloading after I said “download full” program. No error message. I was using Apache prior to this? I had previously downloaded Apache but it quit and does not appear to respond to restore requests? I was in the process of opening

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/27/2016 12:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: ... When we have three PMC members willing to commit to voting (at due time) on the NetBeans plugin, this discussion will make sense. Otherwise we are wasting our time. I generally have at least one Windows box with Netbeans installed, so I should

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 on the three PMC members > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 12:26 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> From:

RE: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

2016-03-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Great news! Thanks, Andrea > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 13:13 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0? > > On 29/01/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > For 4.2.0 we need a Release

Re: branches/gbuild-reintegration merge?

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Damjan Jovanovic wrote: On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: you fixed them "while at it" or are they side effects of the build system changes? Those bug fixes were present in the original gbuild branch - they're not something I developed. I don't know why. OK, thanks for

Re: Release Manager for 4.2.0?

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 29/01/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote: For 4.2.0 we need a Release Manager. I would prefer NOT to be the Release Manager for 4.2.0 since I'm finding that in this period I can help more productively with tasks that do not require constant interaction ... I am surely available to have a significant

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: From: Andrea Pescetti On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. Then all of us are violating the policy every time we update the website. [orcmid] That is not the case for *any* Apache Project web site or the web site for Apache

RE: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
> -Original Message- > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2016 09:46 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans > > On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 3/26/2016 10:37 AM,

Reporting broken download link

2016-03-27 Thread natedegrate
Apache quit downloading after I said “download full” program. No error message. I was using Apache prior to this? I had previously downloaded Apache but it quit and does not appear to respond to restore requests? I was in the process of opening a docx form I had just updated with Free

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 27/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 3/26/2016 10:37 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 3) We recognize that http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/ has different areas, and that not all of them should be subject to the same policy. Just like I don't call a release vote when I change a web page

Re: Getting buildbots operational again

2016-03-27 Thread Kay Schenk
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:51 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 26/03/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126892 >> This will hopefully mean that buildbots get past the "./bootstrap" >> phase. It is a temporary fix >> > > All buildbots

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Carl Marcum
On 03/26/2016 05:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans On 20/03/2016 Patricia

Re: branches/gbuild-reintegration merge?

2016-03-27 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 22/03/2016 Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> For the past month I've been working on preparing the gbuild branch >> for merge into trunk, and I believe it to be essentially ready. > > > Thank you Damjan, this is one of

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/26/2016 2:58 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 10:38 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans On 20/03/2016 Patricia

Re: Releasing the Apache OpenOffice API plugin for NetBeans

2016-03-27 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 3/26/2016 10:37 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 20/03/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: The issue is whether it is ASF distributed software, for which ASF trademarks can appropriately be used. I think it is and should continue to be ASF distributed software. ... 3) We recognize that