Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.

+1 Maybe this would be something for long-term? But what about getting a Developer ID from Apple to get rid of the gatekeeper-messages? A lot of traffic on the user-mailinglist is from people who think they can not install AOO on MacOS because of that... https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491

Re: [Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.

Hi, I’m afraid we need a lot of changes to the software to comply with the sandboxing policy of the Appstore, see

Vote status

With about three hours to go on the vote, I've prepared a spreadsheet based on the [VOTE] thread. The current situation is 10 votes, one [0], nine [+1]. Of the +1 votes, five are binding. The comments indicate a range of different approaches to testing, which is good. Please check the

Re: In regards to Open Office

Le 08/10/2016 à 12:34, Peter Kovacs a écrit : You seem to like the way ODFormat is defined. To be precise, I like the the intent of ODF. Several parties decided to work together so that a fully documented file format could be used with advanced application features (I mean that could store

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC1

+1 I have installed binary 4.1.3-rc1 de Version on OSX El Capitan. Check the general functionality on the writer module. And checked issue 12662 base not open tables and queries in Mac OSX. I have opened a empty document in all other modules. Jose R R schrieb am Sa., 8.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC1

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > The Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 source and binaries, > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/, contain > several bug fixes. See the draft release notes at >

Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1

Patricia Shanahan wrote: Please test again. I have tried to fix both MIT and the KEYS file. Thanks, it works now after importing the new KEYS file: $ gpg --verify apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.asc apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Sat Oct 1

Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1

Patricia Shanahan wrote: I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT, and waited a few days. I can find mine here (note: you have to add "0x" for the search to succeed):

Re: Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1

I had to make a change in the key preferences to meet the release signing requirements. I uploaded to a couple of servers, including MIT, and waited a few days. I didn't think we were supposed to update KEYS directly? On 10/8/2016 6:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This is not a blocker for the

Signature verification for 4.1.3-RC1

This is not a blocker for the release (and moreover signature files are explicitly allowed to be updated during the release vote if needed), but I couldn't verify signatures in a straightforward way for source packages. One of the signatures is mine; no problem with that, and that itself is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.3 RC1

On 05/10/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: Please vote on releasing it as 4.1.3 by replying to this thread [ ] +1 Approve, with description of any testing you have done [ ] 0 Abstain [ ] -1 Disapprove, with explanation. +1 (Binding) Source: verified hashes and (my own) signature, README, LICENSE,

Re: Re: In regards to Open Office

On 04.10.2016 22:04, Hagar Delest wrote: Le 04/10/2016 à 06:50, Peter Kovacs a écrit : ODF has a better trancperency then OOXML. But beeing open we need to embrace and value both formats. My fear is: if AOO exports in OOXML (as LibO does), what will happen to ODF? You seem to like the