Re: Copyright year for our packages

2018-01-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Am 20.01.2018 um 00:08 schrieb Marcus: > Am 19.01.2018 um 19:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hello, >> >> When I look at the installed DEB packages on my Ubuntu system (e.g. with >> "dpkg -s openoffice") I see "Copyright: 2012 by The Apache Software >> Foundation". >> >> Looking at [1] and how it

Re: Copyright year for our packages

2018-01-19 Thread Marcus
Am 19.01.2018 um 19:34 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hello, When I look at the installed DEB packages on my Ubuntu system (e.g. with "dpkg -s openoffice") I see "Copyright: 2012 by The Apache Software Foundation". Looking at [1] and how it was handled at OpenOffice.org I think it should be

Re: Copyright year for our packages

2018-01-19 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Matthias Seidel wrote: When I look at the installed DEB packages on my Ubuntu system (e.g. with "dpkg -s openoffice") I see "Copyright: 2012 by The Apache Software Foundation". Looking at [1] and how it was handled at OpenOffice.org I think it should be "2012-2018" now. I would commit it to

Re: Copyright year for our packages

2018-01-19 Thread Peter kovacs
+1 Am 19. Januar 2018 19:34:23 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hello, > >When I look at the installed DEB packages on my Ubuntu system (e.g. >with >"dpkg -s openoffice") I see "Copyright: 2012 by The Apache Software >Foundation". > >Looking at [1] and how it was

Copyright year for our packages

2018-01-19 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hello, When I look at the installed DEB packages on my Ubuntu system (e.g. with "dpkg -s openoffice") I see "Copyright: 2012 by The Apache Software Foundation". Looking at [1] and how it was handled at OpenOffice.org I think it should be "2012-2018" now. I would commit it to trunk this weekend

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Peter Kovacs
I like the idea. It is a good step. But I thought of less of an information point, or a discussion channel as such. Maybe I try a different approach. I have followed the Munich discussion as closely as I could afford. I even searched for recorded talks from their developers. My impression is

Re: patch to move $CCNUMVER from dmake to configure

2018-01-19 Thread Kay Schenk
On 01/17/2018 11:17 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 16 Jan, Kay Schenk wrote: On 01/11/2018 11:24 PM, Don Lewis wrote: The patch below moves the calculation of $CCNUMVER and some other variables from main/solenv/inc/tg_compv.mk, where it is only usable by dmake, to configure, where it can be used by

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: Peter kovacs [mailto:pe...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 3:28 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public > administration of Barcelona(?) > > Linux.com quotes the newspaper el pais, and there I could > find only open office.

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Peter kovacs
Linux.com quotes the newspaper el pais, and there I could find only open office. So we can say we do not know. I do not think it matters what newspapers sing from the roofs. However what matters is what we do. How about creating a business mailing List. It is like a user list only with business

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: apacheoff...@openmailbox.org > [mailto:apacheoff...@openmailbox.org] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 1:34 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public > administration of Barcelona(?) > > The official European Union website >

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread apacheoffice
The official European Union website (https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/news/public-money-public-code) mentions LibreOffice as the only option explicitly. > From: Jörg Schmidt [mailto:joe...@j-m-schmidt.de] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 12:28 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, I just received a personal email telling me that Catalan is spoken in Barcelona. Therefore, the following note: my reference to the Spanish languages was _not_ meant as a political statement. (I am aware of the current political situation in Catalonia, but I am only an outside observer

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Jörg Schmidt
> From: FR web forum [mailto:ooofo...@free.fr] > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 12:10 PM > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public > administration of Barcelona(?) > > As I said in this thread: >

Re: OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread FR web forum
As I said in this thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/openoffice-dev/201801.mbox/%3C14249123.236052615.1516028654326.JavaMail.root%40zimbra60-e10.priv.proxad.net%3E Barcelona will certainely choose Ubuntu as distro. Ubuntu does not embed OpenOffice. - Mail original - > De:

OpenOffice in the future in the public administration of Barcelona(?)

2018-01-19 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, Through a publication by Heise: https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Stadt-Barcelona-setzt-auf-Open-Source-und-Linux-3944797.html I hear that the city of Barcelona wants to migrate to OpenSource (e. g. OpenOffice). (the original Spanish article based on the above article is here: