Yes I applied them manually. And I took only changes from the version that I
thought the change is about.
Am 27. Oktober 2018 00:22:55 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 27.10.18 um 00:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Am 26.10.18 um
On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 27.10.18 um 00:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 26.10.18 um 21:39 schrieb Don Lewis:
On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
On 26 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> In addition the bundled version of nss has a bunch of CVEs. Even the
> version in trunk has two I believe. I spent most of a week trying to
> upgrade the trunk version and got a successful build on Windows, but
> haven't had time to test it, and my patches need
Am 27.10.18 um 00:10 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 26.10.18 um 21:39 schrieb Don Lewis:
>>> On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>
On 27 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 26.10.18 um 21:39 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 got backed out.
Someone with
Am 26.10.18 um 21:39 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 got backed out.
>>> Someone with a Mac needs to see if the configure.in
Well it is a bummer we can not fix it with 4.1.6. However this one is 6 year
old. It can wait a view month. It is not worth to backport if the same effort
can bring 4.2.0 to live.
Am 26. Oktober 2018 22:04:54 MESZ schrieb Don Lewis :
>raptor 1.4.18 has CVE-2012-0037, otherwise I would not have
raptor 1.4.18 has CVE-2012-0037, otherwise I would not have bothered
with the upgrade.
On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Isn't the main issue whether these are blockers or not?
>
>> On Oct 26, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Oct 26,
Isn't the main issue whether these are blockers or not?
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 3:39 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>>
>>> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887
On 26 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>>
>> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 got backed out.
>> Someone with a Mac needs to see if the configure.in changes are needed
>> or if it builds on a Mac
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 got backed out.
> Someone with a Mac needs to see if the configure.in changes are needed
> or if it builds on a Mac as-is.
I have no idea how to parse the
On 26 Oct, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> Am 26.10.18 um 20:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
>> On 23 Oct, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>> I am a bit confused where we all are now. I think all Issues are
>>> resolved and currently we are not aware on regressions right?
>> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>>
Hi Don,
Am 26.10.18 um 20:30 schrieb Don Lewis:
> On 23 Oct, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>> I am a bit confused where we all are now. I think all Issues are
>> resolved and currently we are not aware on regressions right?
> The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
>
It is most likely better if we start tagging RCs. Anytime we need to "record"
some version, a tag make sense, IMO.
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 2:16 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I went ahead and tagged AOO-4.1.6RC1. If it passes then we can copy that tag
>> to the GA.
>
>
On 23 Oct, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> I am a bit confused where we all are now. I think all Issues are
> resolved and currently we are not aware on regressions right?
The redland/raptor/rasqal upgrade
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127887 got backed out.
Someone with a Mac needs to see if
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I went ahead and tagged AOO-4.1.6RC1. If it passes then we can copy that tag to
the GA.
We don't tag RCs normally, only releases (and we thus do it AFTER the
vote has passed). No problem, it just means that if the vote passes the
tag will be renamed (moved instead of
I went ahead and tagged AOO-4.1.6RC1. If it passes then we can copy that tag to
the GA.
> On Oct 26, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Matthias Seidel
> wrote:
>
> Hi Marcus,
>
> Am 25.10.18 um 23:56 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 25.10.2018 um 23:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> On 23/10/2018 Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Marcus,
Am 25.10.18 um 23:56 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 25.10.2018 um 23:42 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> On 23/10/2018 Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 23.10.18 um 13:06 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
r1844555 was the SVN version of HEAD at the time of the email.
>>> Yes, and it increases by the time of
18 matches
Mail list logo
