Remove of STAX and SAXON

Hello everyone, Pedro hinted STAX can be dropped, and STAX reference is only in the dependency of SAXON. I would like to add SAXON to the removal list. Since to my research no other module references SAXON as a dependency, and we have LIBXSLT in the stomach. So I think Saxon is obsolete.

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

I have seen you on the repository of beanshell. I stared the project now and fully watching it. It is all I can do for now. But if there is something I send in patches. So far no objections for STLPORT removal.  -> STLPORT is still on. Beanshell is still an own Project -> BEANSHELL is off. I

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

Hi guys; FWIW, I am involved in beanshell in my spare time, which is not plenty lately. As mentioned previously it is in github now and a much improved version will be released one day (no ETA). While looking for candidates to remove stuff, consider stax. It is included in Java since JDK5.

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee opened a new pull request #85: Cppuhelper compiler warning fixed

leginee opened a new pull request #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/85 I cleaned the module of all compiler warnings This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #84: fix unitialized variables in delivery.pl by treat undef as 0

Sorry, wrong thread! ;-) Am 25.04.20 um 15:04 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > Hi, > > Am 25.04.20 um 10:36 schrieb GitBox: >> leginee commented on pull request #84: >> URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/84#issuecomment-619343437 >> >> >>I found a small issue in the build logs with

[GitHub] [openoffice] Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #83: Python2718

Pilot-Pirx commented on pull request #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/83#issuecomment-619377299 Just FYI, these are the changes between 2.7.17 and 2.7.18: https://github.com/python/cpython/compare/v2.7.17...v2.7.18

Re: [GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #84: fix unitialized variables in delivery.pl by treat undef as 0

Hi, Am 25.04.20 um 10:36 schrieb GitBox: > leginee commented on pull request #84: > URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/84#issuecomment-619343437 > > >I found a small issue in the build logs with undifened variables. Thge fix > fixed it for me. >Please test and merge Just

Re: harmful code??

*facepalm* Yea of course. Am 25.04.20 um 14:18 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 2:11 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I hunt some Warnings and Errors that get logged during build. I stumbled over this code here in file_misc.cxx [1]: 684 <

Re: harmful code??

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 2:11 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > I hunt some Warnings and Errors that get logged during build. > > I stumbled over this code here in file_misc.cxx [1]: > > 684 > < >

harmful code??

Hello all, I hunt some Warnings and Errors that get logged during build. I stumbled over this code here in file_misc.cxx [1]: 684 *static* oslFileError

Re: Apache OpenOffice Project Information

Hi Andrea, Am 13.04.20 um 17:26 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 12/04/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/site/trunk/content/doap_openoffice.rdf >> >> I would like to have it updated, esp. for the repository change from >> Subversion to Git. >> >> There is a

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #84: fix unitialized variables in delivery.pl by treat undef as 0

leginee commented on pull request #84: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/84#issuecomment-619343437 I found a small issue in the build logs with undifened variables. Thge fix fixed it for me. Please test and merge

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee opened a new pull request #84: fix unitialized variables in delivery.pl by treat undef as 0

leginee opened a new pull request #84: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/84 changed: ../solenv/bin/deliver.pl This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message,

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

Okay, thanks Damjan. I found the mail in Apache Commons and some other mentions. So I think I got confused. Am 25.04.20 um 08:42 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking into it, the

Re: drop ressources (stlport, maybe beanshell)

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 3:50 AM Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Another potential candidate to get Rid of is beanshell. I am looking > into it, the project moved to Apache Commons. I hope that it is still > there under a different name (beanUtil?) > > See https://github.com/beanshell/beanshell#history