Re: "convert' pdf images in Draw

2021-01-08 Thread marcia wilbur
Hi! Thank You! I will test. -marcia - Original Message - From: "Mechtilde" To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 10:16:19 PM Subject: "convert' pdf images in Draw Hello Marcia, Am 06.01.21 um 00:20 schrieb marcia wilbur: > Hi. > > Do we have a feature to open

[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum merged pull request #115: Flaky tests

2021-01-08 Thread GitBox
cbmarcum merged pull request #115: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

[PROPOSAL] add an unsubscribe/help footer to recruitment ML

2021-01-08 Thread Carl Marcum
Hi All, It seems we get a lot of unsubscribe requests to the recruitment@ ML. I propose we add a unsubscribe footer to that list like we have with dev@ and some others. Sorry this is a proposal without a known solution (on my part) but I suspect a ticket to infra may be involved which I

OpenOffice for Mac OS Big Sur 11.1

2021-01-08 Thread john.yohe
Hello, I'm interested in trying the newer version of OpenOffice which would allow me to (maybe) open Word docs with OpenOffice? Was told in the Forums to write to you. Thank you, John Yohe

Fwd: [openoffice] annotated tag AOO419-RC1 created (now a53baa6)

2021-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
> Begin forwarded message: > > From: j...@apache.org > Subject: [openoffice] annotated tag AOO419-RC1 created (now a53baa6) > Date: January 8, 2021 at 2:24:06 PM EST > To: "comm...@openoffice.apache.org" > Reply-To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > > This is an automated email from the ASF

Re: [openoffice] branch AOO419 updated (db583c7 -> 5610821)

2021-01-08 Thread Arrigo Marchiori
Dear All, I apologize for the confusion. I was sure I was working on my own branch! I should have restored everything as it was. Sorry for the noise. On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 06:10:52PM +, ard...@apache.org wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > >

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

2021-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes, that is the current hash. > On Jan 8, 2021, at 10:08 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Am 08.01.21 um 13:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >> By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1 >> so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag. > >

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

2021-01-08 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Jim, Am 08.01.21 um 13:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1 > so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag. That would be 561082130a ? Regards,    Matthias > >> On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>

[GitHub] [openoffice] jimjag merged pull request #116: [writerfilter] Add checks for non-empty stacks

2021-01-08 Thread GitBox
jimjag merged pull request #116: URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/116 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to

Re: Intent to roll AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds

2021-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
By COB today (Friday the 8th) I plan on tagging HEAD of AOO419 as AOO419-RC1 so we can start builds over the weekend from that tag. > On Jan 6, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Matthias and I will be starting our AOO 4.1.9-RC1 builds over > the weekend for testing by the start of next

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info - bug 127952

2021-01-08 Thread Jim Jagielski
This seems like a safe and non-controversial fix to me... > On Jan 7, 2021, at 4:31 PM, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 07:03:19AM -0800, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 6 Jan, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 9:19 AM, Arrigo Marchiori