Hello Peter, All,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:00:44PM +0100, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> +1 for Option 3)
>
[... FTR ...]
> > 3- raise an exception because it is just not acceptable.
I believe it should be a subclass of uno::Exception, but... which one?
There seem to be a lot of Exception's
ardovm opened a new pull request #122:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/122
This is a work-in-progress fix for
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=128356
Please keep the discussion about the "philosophy" of the patch on Bugzilla.
Code style, variable names,
My concern is related to security. Consider a bad actor who creates an
extension that, for instance, harvests personal info. It's one thing if
they are listed on a web page. It's a completely different thing if they
are sanctioned by the AOO project by being more tightly associated with the
AOO
FYI -
Here is the trick if the site goes missing and shows “Forbidden”.
> On Feb 4, 2021, at 7:31 AM, w...@apache.org wrote:
>
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
>
> wave pushed a commit to branch asf-site
> in repository
Hi -
Yes. I worked with ASF Infra team to resync OpenOffice.org. The trick was to
make a trivial change to the README.md on the asf-site branch of
GitHub.com/apache/openoffice-org then wait a few minutes for 12GB to copy.
Thanks everyone for the report.
Regards,
Dave
> On Feb 4, 2021, at
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:27 AM Matthias Seidel
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports
> >
> > Forbidden
> > You don't have permission to access this resource.
>
> Confirmed from Germany.
>
> >
> >
> >> On
And now it is back...
Am 04.02.21 um 16:27 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>> It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports
>>
>> Forbidden
>> You don't have permission to access this resource.
> Confirmed from Germany.
>
>>
>>> On
Hi all,
Am 04.02.21 um 16:09 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports
>
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access this resource.
Confirmed from Germany.
>
>
>> On 02/04/2021 3:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi -
>>
>> It’s available here
It was down for some time, then recovered and now it reports
Forbidden
You don't have permission to access this resource.
> On 02/04/2021 3:05 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Hi -
>
> It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
It's back.
Am 04.02.2021 um 16:05 schrieb Dave Fisher:
Hi -
It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe.
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 4, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
Hi,
it seems that www.openoffice.org cannot be accessed in the moment.
Hi -
It’s available here in the US. Would someone check in Europe.
Thanks,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 4, 2021, at 6:39 AM, Joost Andrae wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it seems that www.openoffice.org cannot be accessed in the moment.
>
> https://openoffice.apache.org/ is available
>
> Kind
Hi,
it seems that www.openoffice.org cannot be accessed in the moment.
https://openoffice.apache.org/ is available
Kind regards, Joost
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands,
Hello Jim,
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 02:25:16PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Funny that you bring this up... I'm been tracking down some bugs and they
> all seem to be XML related...
:-)
[...]
> I feel that making AOO more fragile by trying to work around cases where
> invalid and/or
+1 for Option 3)
On 03.02.21 19:38, Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
Dear List,
bug 128356 [1] is mostly about an XML tag that carries an attribute
_twice_. This is not allowed; the SAX parser raises an exception when
it finds it while loading the file, and the user gets upset because
they cannot open
14 matches
Mail list logo