Am 22.08.23 um 21:50 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori:
Hello All,
I am sorry for chiming in very late.
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
Hi Peter, All,
Am 02.07.23 um 17:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
Am 02.07.23 um 16:03 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Hi Peter,
Am 19.06.23
Hello All,
I am sorry for chiming in very late.
On Tue, Jul 04, 2023 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Peter, All,
>
> Am 02.07.23 um 17:35 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> >
> > Am 02.07.23 um 16:03 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> >> Hi Peter,
> >>
> >> Am 19.06.23 um 22:57 schrieb Peter
Dear All,
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 05:23:50PM +0200, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> Good find!
>
> "OpenOffice" (exactly written like that) is a registered trademark of the
> ASF.
>
> I think we need to add that to our list of trademark violations?
+1
If we wanted to follow this way,
Hi Pedro,
Good find!
"OpenOffice" (exactly written like that) is a registered trademark of
the ASF.
I think we need to add that to our list of trademark violations?
Regards,
Matthias
Am 22.08.23 um 17:13 schrieb Pedro Lino:
I think it is a good idea. As I mentioned before, I'm
I think it is a good idea. As I mentioned before, I'm available to contribute
and implementing ODF 1.3 is a good goal.
However, there is already an Open Collective for OpenOffice, although I'm not
sure if it refers to this Office suite...
https://opencollective.com/openoffice
Best,
Pedro
>
