On 3/13/13 8:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:57:16PM +0100, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann
wrote:
Please have a lock at issue [1] 48409, esp. at attachment
Revisoin 2639 of the odt2wiki transformation (formerly known as
odt2txt) [2].
For me it looks like that XSL
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:29:19AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
I have contacted Bernard and he was very open minded regarding
re-licensing and he was very cooperative.
He has reviewed the transformation (link From Ariel) and compared it
to a version in his own repo. He has appended a new
Hi,
On 13.03.2013 07:54, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/13/13 3:32 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi,
while investigating what to do for bug
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121874 I read this
license header on the XSL style sheet used by the extension to
export:
On 3/13/13 12:57 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 13.03.2013 07:54, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/13/13 3:32 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi,
while investigating what to do for bug
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121874 I read this
license header on the XSL style
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:57:16PM +0100, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Please have a lock at issue [1] 48409, esp. at attachment Revisoin
2639 of the odt2wiki transformation (formerly known as odt2txt)
[2].
For me it looks like that XSL style sheet had been contributed to
OpenOffice.
