Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 12/03/2013 Jürgen Schmidt wrote: But in general, yes I think it can be a candidate for GSOC when somebody will mentor it. OK. I've now entered it in Bugzilla, not to lose track of it: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121909 Regards, Andrea.

Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-12 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 11/03/2013 Juergen Schmidt wrote: googletest. Good to know that it can do what I expected or better Is this a good candidate project for the Google Summer of Code? If it is, please let's track it somewhere in Bugzilla and/or put a reference in

Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-12 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 3/12/13 9:09 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 11/03/2013 Juergen Schmidt wrote: googletest. Good to know that it can do what I expected or better Is this a good candidate project for the Google Summer of Code? If it is, please let's track it somewhere in Bugzilla and/or put a reference in

[CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-11 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, as part of our ip cleanup we remove the cppunit sources and allow the system cppunit only. This is sup-optimal and a limitation from my point of view. I looked for an alternative and found GoogleTest [1] which seems to be a possible alternative. I don't have time to investigate deeper in

[CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-11 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
Hi, as part of our ip cleanup we remove the cppunit sources and allow the system cppunit only. This is sup-optimal and a limitation from my point of view. I looked for an alternative and found GoogleTest [1] which seems to be a possible alternative. I don't have time to investigate deeper in

Re: [CODE][PROPOSAL]: replace cppunit with GoogleTest

2013-03-11 Thread janI
On 11 March 2013 16:56, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, as part of our ip cleanup we remove the cppunit sources and allow the system cppunit only. This is sup-optimal and a limitation from my point of view. I looked for an alternative and found GoogleTest [1] which seems to