Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

This has been the case for years. Recall that the binary builds are community convenience packages. > On Jul 10, 2022, at 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: > > Hi All, > > Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and > not Jim's (the Release Manager). > The policy

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

Hi Carl, Am 10.07.22 um 22:56 schrieb Carl Marcum: > On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's >> signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). >> The policy states [1] : >> "All supplied packages MUST be

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

On 7/10/22 4:51 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: Hi All, Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). The policy states [1] : "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release Manager with a detached signature." I

Re: [Discuss] Vote on Release AOO 4.1.13-RC1 as GA

Hi All, Checking the signature on the windows binaries I get Matthias's signature and not Jim's (the Release Manager). The policy states [1] : "All supplied packages MUST be cryptographically signed by the Release Manager with a detached signature." I understand the logistics and that