Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread janI
On 5 April 2013 09:16, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0,

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-05 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 4/5/13 10:21 AM, janI wrote: On 5 April 2013 09:16, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/4/13 9:22 PM, janI wrote: On 4 April 2013 20:58, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:21 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra

Re: [Lazy concensus] language merge into trunk.

2013-04-04 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 04/04/2013 05:21 PM, schrieb janI: Hi. Since we are now putting a lot of positive energy into 4.0, we have a lot of changes in trunk and at the same time I have made language changes in the l10n branch. This is a bad combination, that gives me quite some extra manual work. Furthermore I