In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is
currently and that there is an urgent need to turn down the number of mails.
Marcus
Am 08/28/2015 11:58 PM, schrieb Phillip Rhodes:
So what, if anything,
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
On Aug 29, 2015 02:42, Marcus marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
In any case this is too much traffic on the private mailing list.
I would understand Dennis' mail as a wake-up call how much it is currently
and that there is an urgent
On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for example. The
thing to look carefully at is what is being discussed
On Aug 29, 2015 12:21, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/15 8:39 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
I'd love to see a comparison with a half dozen other projects.
I would discourage any reasoning based on aggregate message counts.
Every +1 on a PMC member VOTE counts as a message, for
it just to satisfy
themselves that their activity is as confined as it is thought to be.
-Original Message-
From: Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2015 09:21
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Separating out [VOTE] and maybe even [DISCUSS] threads related to
[VOTE]s and/or lazy consensus should be possible. I will look into
that as a refinement in future reports.
I would save you some hours and rely on easy indicators and on a clear
goal: full
We could reduce private traffic if we discussed the policy for trademarks in
public. The community can help write a clear policy statement with real and
fictional examples. This would serve the community by reducing private
inquiries to unusual cases not previously considered or unclearly
On Aug 29, 2015 14:02, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
Rich,
I have no means to produce comparisons with other projects and it is out
of scope for me here. Maybe other projects might undertake it just to
satisfy themselves that their activity is as confined as it is thought to
From an AOO PMC Member,
I have compiled a high-level traffic analysis of discussion activity on the
OpenOffice PMC private@ oo.a.o list. These are *statistics* and noisy ones at
that. I am looking for trends that are good-enough at this level of precision.
It is in the nature of private@
. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 12:09
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July
From an AOO PMC Member,
I have compiled a high-level traffic analysis of discussion activity on the
OpenOffice PMC private
So what, if anything, should we take away from this? My (completely
superficial, naive and uninformed) feeling is that that is a LOT of traffic
on the private list. But maybe not. Anyway, is the idea here that there
should be less traffic on that list? More? The same?
I have to admit, I've
question and welcome back, Phil.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:motley.crue@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2015 14:59
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [REPORT] PMC 2015-07 Private-List Activity through July
So what, if anything, should we take
12 matches
Mail list logo
