Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-06 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 12/5/2016 12:35 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: ... # Concerning 12h period. (did not find who brought this up :) ) What I mean is that it would be great if we could devide all activities in good estimate able chunks. Agile methology claims everything that an experienced developer estimates beyond

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-06 Thread Carl Marcum
On 12/06/2016 01:39 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-06 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Peter Kovacs wrote: Also there are lots of document that describe old processes in Planing and so forth. We should Archive them too. However I can not move things to an appropriate Folder. So I left the Link to avoid unlinked pages. Can we maybe add a Open Office.org Archieve and move all the

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-06 Thread Marcus
Am 12/06/2016 07:39 AM, schrieb Peter Kovacs: I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-06 Thread Peter Kovacs
I have now Archieved the Roadmap on the Mediawiki. It is now in a subpage features/Archieve/OOo 3.3 And put a note out that the new Roadmap is to be found on the Confluence Wiki. But I have not delivered any link. Should I add it? Also there are lots of document that describe old processes in

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Peter Kovacs
I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release Plan and the a Backlog where we simply collect

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Marcus
Am 12/05/2016 09:35 PM, schrieb Peter Kovacs: Because I read much concern about the freedom of activity and meritocratic spirit of the Project. In my eyes it is not about who does what, but where we want to go. This has to be a common understanding. Nothing more, nothing less is the intent. The

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Keith N. McKenna
On 12/4/2016 2:13 PM, toki wrote: > > > On 03/12/16 12:21, Peter Kovacs wrote: > >> But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the >> will to fight alone through all the mess, you will give up fast because >> you have no Idea what your next step is. > >

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Matthias Seidel
Yes, we could use our cWiki for that... Apart from that, it would be a good idea to give our users a small overview of what is planned for the future. Maybe combined with a Christmas greeting? ;-) regards, Matthias Am 04.12.2016 um 15:11 schrieb Marcus: > Am 12/03/2016 01:21 PM, schrieb Peter

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hi All, Because I read much concern about the freedom of activity and meritocratic spirit of the Project. In my eyes it is not about who does what, but where we want to go. This has to be a common understanding. Nothing more, nothing less is the intent. The meritocratic workbase is not

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-05 Thread Raphael Bircher
Hi Peter, * Am 12/3/2016 um 1:21 PM schrieb Peter Kovacs: Hello all, I thought a little. There were some people claiming that they want to help. But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the will to fight alone through all the mess, you will give up fast because you have

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-04 Thread toki
On 03/12/16 12:21, Peter Kovacs wrote: > But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the > will to fight alone through all the mess, you will give up fast because > you have no Idea what your next step is. https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Features

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-04 Thread Marcus
Am 12/03/2016 01:21 PM, schrieb Peter Kovacs: So I suggest to keep Bugzilla as Bugtracker, and use Jira as a Todo backlog List type. I love Agile methology. Never came to use it thought, because companies can not deal well if there is no timeframe. But I think for us its perfect. we have

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-04 Thread Jörg Schmidt
Hello, > From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] > I thought a little. There were some people claiming that they want to > help. But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the > will to fight alone through all the mess, you will give up > fast because > you have no

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-04 Thread Matthias Seidel
+1 for a roadmap! regards, Matthias Am 03.12.2016 um 13:21 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hello all, > > I thought a little. There were some people claiming that they want to > help. But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the > will to fight alone through all the mess, you will

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-03 Thread Patricia Shanahan
I think there is something that comes before this. Developers need to be able to build AOO. I think we still need more work on the step-by-step instructions, making sure they are complete and work for all systems. On 12/3/2016 4:21 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I thought a little. There

[discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

2016-12-03 Thread Peter Kovacs
Hello all, I thought a little. There were some people claiming that they want to help. But then wrote nothing more. I think if you come here, with the will to fight alone through all the mess, you will give up fast because you have no Idea what your next step is. I personally do not have the