On 12/12/12 10:48 AM, janI wrote:
-1, sorry but this thread is spiraling out to a theoretical discussion, so
I allow myself to focus it back:
I don't agree here but I am fine with the way how you plan to move forward.
So please continue the upgrade first, keep user registration manual for
now
+1
--
Andrew Pitonyak
My Macro Document: http://www.pitonyak.org/AndrewMacro.odt
Info: http://www.pitonyak.org/oo.php
On 12/10/2012 09:39 AM, janI wrote:
On 10 December 2012 17:51, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users
are
very
to me it is a long term solution
alternatives are:
1) open up, and get spam
2) use some of the spam measures, like e.g. cool off period = 4 days.
The most efficient measure is a manual creation, and if I count correctly
we talk about less than 10 new users in a month.
Please feel free to
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
very low and since the normal spam measures have received a -1, I propose
the following for the new Wiki.
What was the normal measure that got a -1?
Are
On 12/10/12 5:33 PM, janI wrote:
to me it is a long term solution
+1 when taking into account that we have 10 or less requests per month
Juergen
alternatives are:
1) open up, and get spam
2) use some of the spam measures, like e.g. cool off period = 4 days.
The most efficient
On 12/10/12 5:45 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 9:52 AM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
we have now seen over the last period that the number of new wiki users are
very low and since the normal spam measures have received a -1, I propose
the following for the new Wiki.
What was
Hello Jan, all.
10.12.2012 22:33, janI пишет:
The most efficient measure is a manual creation, and if I count correctly
we talk about less than 10 new users in a month.
I think the manual registration for new wiki users is not good.
We have created 12 new user accounts since 24 November.
Some users think they need an account just to read, but that might not be
the case with these users.
Helen: you have the procedure in your head, could you not simulate a new
user, and verify it works ?
I have no problem with the old automated procedure, as long as sysop
understand the risk of a
I've verified for the new account: Testaccount. The manual
registration a new wiki user works fine:
* Email with a random password has been sent. I received it normal.
* When I first login as Testaccount with this password, Wiki offers me
change the password and shows me the form for it.
* The
10 matches
Mail list logo
