Hi Pedro,
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
Absolutely. For the same reason the internal NSS should be updated.
Would you be interested in doing it? You did a great
Hi Andrew,
On 22.10.2013 20:00, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 10/22/2013 7:15 AM, Herbert Dürr wrote:
[...]
With these new insights I suggest to remove both the enable-mozilla
and its eventual replacement enable-mozab-module before losing much
more time on that topic. The sooner the better.
+1
This
On 23 October 2013 13:57, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
Absolutely. For the same reason the internal NSS should
On 23.10.2013 14:05, janI wrote:
On 23 October 2013 13:57, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
[..]
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
Absolutely. For the same
On 10/23/13 2:05 PM, janI wrote:
On 23 October 2013 13:57, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Pedro,
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
Absolutely. For the
On 22.10.2013 22:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Herbert Dürr wrote:
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=85356
[2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
[3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
This is an interesting reality check and I'm afraid the project
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient) version
of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with its security
About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient)
version of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with
its security features enabled such as support for password protected
documents.
The
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
About everyone who ever built OpenOffice in the last couple of years
wondered why an almost complete (and obsolete/unmaintained/ancient) version
of Mozilla Seamonkey was needed when building OpenOffice with its security
features
On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway, so on Mac we could rid AOO of its heavy Seamonkey
dependency really soon without removing any features by
On 22 October 2013 16:15, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 22.10.2013 14:22, Herbert Dürr wrote:
On 22.10.2013 13:46, janI wrote:
On 22 October 2013 13:30, Herbert Dürr h...@apache.org wrote:
[...]
Since issue 91209 the mozilla address books were disabled on Mac
altogether anyway,
Hello;
Really nice to see nss being split soon. I hope we can use an external
nss too as the one we include internally is somewhat outdated and
potentially insecure.
While on the subject of replacing mozilla addressbook, just thought I'd
remind about the analysis done by Andre while we were
Herbert Dürr wrote:
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=85356
[2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=63270
[3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=91079
This is an interesting reality check and I'm afraid the project lost
users that depended on that
13 matches
Mail list logo
