2014-04-23 1:37 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
On 22/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-22 0:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
Andrea are you saying we should re-route RCs download requests coming from
all referrals (but
On 3/7/14, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
How much do we care about this? The risk, I suppose, is on
Softpedia, that we could find a last-minute
On 3/7/14, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
2014-04-22 0:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
On 19/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Our aim I believe it's to expand our userbase, redirecting them to an
openoffice page explaining which are the options might be a good thing.
We can reuse, and possibly reword, this page
On 22/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-22 0:14 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
Andrea are you saying we should re-route RCs download requests coming from
all referrals (but openoffice.org and sourceforge.net) to that page?
That would be
On 19/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
Our aim I believe it's to expand our userbase, redirecting them to an
openoffice page explaining which are the options might be a good thing.
We can reuse, and possibly reword, this page then:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html
This is
On 02/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
softpedia.com ... passes traffic through our download redirector flow
... we can indeed redirect this traffic by referrer to a
different landing page if one is provided.
Can't we just serve a 403? It's their problem, not ours. It's not rude
at all, it's
2014-04-19 16:21 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:
On 02/04/2014 Roberto Galoppini wrote:
softpedia.com ... passes traffic through our download redirector flow
... we can indeed redirect this traffic by referrer to a
different landing page if one is provided.
Can't we just
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01
On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus
2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto
Am 04/03/2014 02:27 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
2014-04-03 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/03/2014 02:27 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-03 13:09 GMT+02:00 Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto
Am 04/03/2014 01:09 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
Am 04/03/2014 12:57 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus
2014-04-03 21:44 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/03/2014 12:57 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 4/3/14 12:09 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
2014-04-03 8:52 GMT+02:00 Jürgen Schmidtjogischm...@gmail.com:
On 4/2/14 11:19 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM,
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at
Am 04/02/2014 06:52 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Roberto Galoppini
roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Am 04/02/2014 09:22 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-02 21:15 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 04/02/2014 06:20 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-04-01 21:30 GMT+02:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar
Am 03/31/2014 11:56 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus
+1 I like this way
Am 31.03.2014 22:48, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/09/2014 06:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/09/2014 06:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/29/2014 09:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
2014-03-28 21:24 GMT+01:00 Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de:
Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb
Am 03/13/2014 10:01 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/09/2014 06:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
Or maybe a disclaimer in the voting thread email?
On 3/9/14 8:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/
On 10.03.2014 08:32, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/9/14 8:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
Am 03/10/2014 08:32 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
On 3/9/14 8:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
Am 03/10/2014 08:57 AM, schrieb Andre Fischer:
On 10.03.2014 08:32, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 3/9/14 8:49 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea
Am 03/08/2014 12:29 AM, schrieb Vladislav Stevanovic:
When somebody want to download beta version of AOO it will be good aproach
to show pop-up dialog with warnings that this is not stable version and it
only for testing. We can not stopped other to write what they write about
AOO but we can
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/
Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
Or maybe a disclaimer in the voting thread email?
Andrew's
On 09/03/2014 Kay Schenk wrote:
The concern is
for the inadvertent download of not yet released Beta which is available
from the following URL space which is not even SourceForge:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/milestones
Correct?
No. The link Rob posted at the beginning of this
Am 03/09/2014 07:33 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 03/08/2014 12:09 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Rob Weir wrote:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/
Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
Or maybe a disclaimer
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
How much do we care about this? The risk, I suppose, is on
Softpedia, that we could find a last-minute defect in the NOTICE or
other legal files, and
Hi,
On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
How much do we care about this? The risk, I suppose, is on
Softpedia, that we could find a last-minute defect
On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
How much do we care about this? The risk, I suppose, is
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
On 3/7/14 4:33 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/7/14 4:21 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
Hi,
On 07.03.2014 15:22, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
A water-mark on new documents that directs people to find official
distributions on the web site? The water-mark will be taken off when AOO
is out of beta and an official release is available. At the least this
would require those who want to just redistribute know enough programming
to make it
On 3/7/2014 6:22 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
Evidently we're already released, on some websites at least:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
Also, what of the Editor's review?
It is derived from the IBM Lotus Symphony suite of applications...
- not
On 7 March 2014 22:30, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote:
It is derived from the IBM Lotus Symphony suite of applications...
- not correct
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/merging_lotus_symphony_allegro_moderato
suggests this is not an unfair statement. Indeed, just rebasing on
Rob Weir wrote:
http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Office/Office-Suites/Apache-OpenOffice-253.shtml
Or maybe a disclaimer in the voting thread email?
Andrew's comments show clearly that these editors do not care to be
careful or factual, or even read those disclaimers, unfortunately.
We can be
When somebody want to download beta version of AOO it will be good aproach
to show pop-up dialog with warnings that this is not stable version and it
only for testing. We can not stopped other to write what they write about
AOO but we can protect potential users with info dialog when they press
48 matches
Mail list logo
