On 30 Sep, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Hello Don,
>
> in configure.sh I had this line :
>
> --with-build-version="aoo42x-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`\n
> ${GitHash}"
>
> Because I want to have the corresponding git hash I built, I need the
> output in two lines.
Instead of \n, try
Hello Don,
in configure.sh I had this line :
--with-build-version="aoo42x-$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`\n
${GitHash}"
Because I want to have the corresponding git hash I built, I need the
output in two lines.
Thanks for your help
Kind regards
Mechtilde
Am 30.09.20 um 08:38 schrieb
On 30 Sep, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I set up a recent build environment with Debian 9.
>
> I have got the same error message again:
>
> ~/openoffice/main/instsetoo_native$ build --from cui
> build -- version: -
>
>
> =
> Building module cui
> =
>
> Entering
Hello,
I set up a recent build environment with Debian 9.
I have got the same error message again:
~/openoffice/main/instsetoo_native$ build --from cui
build -- version: -
=
Building module cui
=
Entering /home/mechtilde/openoffice/main/cui/prj
cd .. && make -s -r
Hi Mechtilde,
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 5:23 AM Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello again,
>
> I did a recent git pull AOO42X and try to build it under Debian 9.
>
> It didn't build. it fails with error in main/cui/Library_cui.mk:37
>
> If I patched it as before then it builds succesfully.
>
> Either we
Hello again,
I did a recent git pull AOO42X and try to build it under Debian 9.
It didn't build. it fails with error in main/cui/Library_cui.mk:37
If I patched it as before then it builds succesfully.
Either we need a switch for Debian 9 and may be newer
distribution/versions or we need
Hello,
I start again to build AOO at a machine with Debian 9 as I did some
times before.
Again I get the message that the build failed in
main/cui/Library_cui.mk:37. I remembered that I had the problem before
and committed a fix for that line.
Some times later this fix was reverted because it
Am 19.01.19 um 09:45 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
> have you tried
>
> rm -r
> /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/de_inprogress/DEBS
>
> as a solution?
There isn't a directory
have you tried
rm -r
/home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/de_inprogress/DEBS
as a solution?
On 19.01.19 07:24, Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> Am 17.01.19 um 15:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Well, the error I was hitting is fixed, yeah.
>>
>>
Hello Jim,
Am 17.01.19 um 15:44 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Well, the error I was hitting is fixed, yeah.
>
> You may need to blow away main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/* and rebuild
Yes I did so.
I do a and then there were no unxlngx6.pro/* in
main/instsetoo_native. But it doesn't work. I get
Well, the error I was hitting is fixed, yeah.
You may need to blow away main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/* and rebuild
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 9:32 AM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 15.01.19 um 19:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> As a reminder, w/ AOO 4.2.0, our Productname is now
Hello,
Am 15.01.19 um 19:42 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> As a reminder, w/ AOO 4.2.0, our Productname is now "Apache_OpenOffice"
>
> Notice the "_" :(
>
> I am guessing that's a dpg/deb restriction??
Does it mean it should build now?
I get with r1851505 from aoo42x branch:
. /usr/bin/fakeroot
As a reminder, w/ AOO 4.2.0, our Productname is now "Apache_OpenOffice"
Notice the "_" :(
I am guessing that's a dpg/deb restriction??
OK... here are the pertinent sections of the log... Of particular note, look at
the "Product names should only contain letters and numbers!" error.
12.189364 : lang : ##
12.189396 : lang : epm call for openoffice-en-US-calc
12.189425 :
Am 15. Januar 2019 18:27:27 MEZ schrieb Damjan Jovanovic :
>Does 4.1.x build on Debian 9?
I never test it.
>> >Mechtilde Stehmann
>> >## Apache OpenOffice
>> >## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
>> >## Debian Developer
>> >## PGP encryption welcome
>> >## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998
Does 4.1.x build on Debian 9?
On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 1:17 PM Stehmann wrote:
> it does't build with epm 4.2 too. As I described before it works under
> Debian 8. So I habe no idea where to start with bisect.
>
> Mechtilde
>
> Am 15. Januar 2019 08:13:50 MEZ schrieb Mechtilde :
> >the same
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 8:13 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Jan 15, 2019, at 2:36 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>
>> Maybe it is a good point to ask infra to switch to git?
>>
>
> Or maybe encourage people to use git-svn?
>
There is this... never tried it though:
> On Jan 15, 2019, at 2:36 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Maybe it is a good point to ask infra to switch to git?
>
Or maybe encourage people to use git-svn?
Let me do another build (verbose) and really dig thru the logs
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
it does't build with epm 4.2 too. As I described before it works under Debian
8. So I habe no idea where to start with bisect.
Mechtilde
Am 15. Januar 2019 08:13:50 MEZ schrieb Mechtilde :
>the same revision buids under Debian 8 with epm version 3.7 which is
>shipped in the source code.
>
Maybe it is a good point to ask infra to switch to git?
On 15.01.19 08:13, Mechtilde wrote:
> the same revision buids under Debian 8 with epm version 3.7 which is
> shipped in the source code.
>
> but this doesn't work with Debian 9 and CentOS 7.
>
> Now I run it with system epm 4.2 on Debian 9.
the same revision buids under Debian 8 with epm version 3.7 which is
shipped in the source code.
but this doesn't work with Debian 9 and CentOS 7.
Now I run it with system epm 4.2 on Debian 9. In some hours I will send
the result.
Mechtilde
Am 15.01.19 um 02:12 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> I
I can't see much in that output, and you're not going to like my suggestion.
Clone AOO from a Git repository, find an old version that could build debs,
and then do a regression test with "git bisect" to find the first commit
that broke building debs, so we can see where and how it went wrong and
Yeah... getting this on my CentOS7 builds as well...
Just on debs... rpms are fine.
> On Jan 14, 2019, at 4:37 PM, Mechtilde wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am 10.01.19 um 07:01 schrieb Mechtilde:
>>
>>
>> Am 10.01.19 um 03:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am glad it worked.
>>>
>>>
Hello,
Am 10.01.19 um 07:01 schrieb Mechtilde:
>
>
> Am 10.01.19 um 03:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am glad it worked.
>>
>> Sure, patch the whole 42x branch.
>
> As I described in the other thread it breaks at building with epm.
>
> It says I had to rebuild instsetoo_native.
I
Am 10.01.19 um 03:07 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Hi
>
> I am glad it worked.
>
> Sure, patch the whole 42x branch.
As I described in the other thread it breaks at building with epm.
It says I had to rebuild instsetoo_native.
Regards
--
Mechtilde Stehmann
## Apache OpenOffice
## Freie
Hi
I am glad it worked.
Sure, patch the whole 42x branch.
Regards
Damjan
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 11:54 PM Mechtilde wrote:
> Hello
>
> Now I have checkout AOO42x too
>
> I will also commit the changes in
> main/basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx for AOO42x.
>
> Is it ok?
>
> Regards
Hello
Now I have checkout AOO42x too
I will also commit the changes in
main/basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx for AOO42x.
Is it ok?
Regards
Mechtilde
Am 09.01.19 um 22:08 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello Damjan
>
> Am 09.01.19 um 16:28 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
>> Please post the output
Hello Damjan
Am 09.01.19 um 16:28 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Please post the output of your "gcc -dumpversion".
>
> Are you able to try some changes out?
> If so, on line 86 of main/basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx,
> change the 0 to 0u (which is used elsewhere in that file and
Hello Damjan
Am 09.01.19 um 16:28 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:
> Please post the output of your "gcc -dumpversion".
My gcc version under Debian 9 is 6.3.0
>
> Are you able to try some changes out?
This takes time.
> If so, on line 86 of main/basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx,
> change
Please post the output of your "gcc -dumpversion".
Are you able to try some changes out?
If so, on line 86 of main/basebmp/inc/basebmp/packedpixeliterator.hxx,
change the 0 to 0u (which is used elsewhere in that file and works).
Then try building again and report back.
Regards
Damjan
On Fri,
Hello,
Am 04.01.19 um 03:00 schrieb leg...@posteo.de:
> You have to set the cxxflag g98+ or so i think.
> Also you should set some flag to switch the behaviour of binary compare. But
> i forgot wich one it is.
>
> Maybe in mails from 2016 ör 2017 you can find further hints.
I haven't enough
You have to set the cxxflag g98+ or so i think.
Also you should set some flag to switch the behaviour of binary compare. But i
forgot wich one it is.
Maybe in mails from 2016 ör 2017 you can find further hints.
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2019 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> for the translation
Hello,
for the translation Process I build successfully under Centos 7 and
Debian 8. Debian 8 builds with openjdk 7
Now I want to build under Debian 9 which become oldstable mid of this year.
I set up the build environment as I did it for Debian8 only with newer
version like newer gcc and newer
34 matches
Mail list logo
