Considering forums.openoffice.org altogether, I would vote for
wiki.openoffice.org instead of wiki.openoffice.apache.org.
1. The existing community is built on this current host name. It would
only confuse the community to change it. This is especially true that
we have changed it just
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form *.openoffice.org (Freeware/shareware). This despite the fact
that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
fact that we use pieces of OO.
So my personal preference would be to at least keep a means
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form *.openoffice.org (Freeware/shareware). This despite the fact
that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
fact that we use pieces of OO.
So my
On 18 January 2013 19:25, 依瑪貓 ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form *.openoffice.org (Freeware/shareware). This despite the fact
that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org,
On 18 January 2013 19:39, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/01/19 02:30, janI said:
On 18 January 2013 19:25, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form
於 2013年01月19日 03:25, janI 提到:
On 18 January 2013 19:39, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/01/19 02:30, janI said:
On 18 January 2013 19:25, imacat ima...@mail.imacat.idv.tw wrote:
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked
janI wrote:
On 2013/01/19 00:24, Donald Whytock said:
FWIW, my company for the longest time firewall-blocked anything of the
form *.openoffice.org (Freeware/shareware). This despite the fact
that I could reach Sourceforge, *.apache.org, etc., and despite the
fact that we use pieces of OO.
I
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of wiki.openoffice.org or wiki.openoffice.apache.org
Background: We decided sometime ago to let me upgrade mwiki, which I did,
with great help from many in here.
After that there has been a relatively high
14 Gennaio 2013 15:09
Oggetto: Mwiki possible name change.
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of wiki.openoffice.org or wiki.openoffice.apache.org
Background: We decided sometime ago to let me upgrade mwiki, which I did,
with great help from
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:09 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of wiki.openoffice.org or wiki.openoffice.apache.org
Background: We decided sometime ago to let me upgrade mwiki, which I did,
with great
On Jan 14, 2013 10:52 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:09 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of wiki.openoffice.org or
wiki.openoffice.apache.org
Background: We
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:10 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
On Jan 14, 2013 10:52 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:09 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of
On 01/14/2013 01:52 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 3:09 PM, janI j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
I want to inform the community about an ongoing discussion in Infra
regarding the use of wiki.openoffice.org or wiki.openoffice.apache.org
Background: We decided sometime ago to let me
janI wrote:
I am sorry to have partly caused the current situation, I wanted to make a
clean installation to make the VM easier to maintain, had I not done that,
the https discussion would problaly never have surfaced.
Really? Don't worry, it has been under discussion for months, you aren't
14 matches
Mail list logo
