On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>
wrote:
> On 17/10/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
>>> were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
>>>
>> The AOO410 branch ne
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
> Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>
>>> Are all of these FreeBSD specific? We are not going to merge a lot of
>>> patches now that we are in the final QA phase. If
Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Are all of these FreeBSD specific? We are not going to merge a lot of
patches now that we are in the final QA phase. If you want to work on this
discuss on Bugzilla (just open an issue and CC me, pescetti), but I'm
On 17 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 18 Oct, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>> On 17/10/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
>>>> FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
>>>> were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
>>> The AOO410 branch needs r1697228, r169
On 17/10/2015 Don Lewis wrote:
FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
The AOO410 branch needs r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and
r1697312 from trunk (which are sequential commits with no unrelated
commits between
FWIW ...
FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
I don't have more details.
Pedro.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
On 17 Oct, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> FWIW ...
>
> FreeBSD's ports builds, which include the latest release candidate,
> were now marked broken with OpenJDK8.
>
> I don't have more details.
The AOO410 branch needs r1697228, r1697237, r1697247, r1697306, and
r1697312 from trunk (wh