On 1/22/13 4:06 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:43 PM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted
On 22 January 2013 15:06, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not going to do this on your timing or your terms.
The other apposite Wikipedia policy page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
(Compare: https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/draftlist-conduct-policy.html
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:21 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2013 15:06, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'm not going to do this on your timing or your terms.
The other apposite Wikipedia policy page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
https://plus.google.com/111502940353406919728/posts/3CUDTZoTsAp
You wrote:
OO is dead, LO is alive, switch immediately.
The article sorta gets that across - read the history and LibreOffice
sections. Apache OpenOffice is a
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:45 AM, David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 January 2013 15:36, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So this does not suggest good faith. In fact, it suggests a
profound ignorance of the project and what we've been doing, as well
as having an axe to grind.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Rob;
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
- Messaggio originale -
Da: Rob Weir
...
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
Useful pages in dealing with contentious topics (which is everything):
David Gerard wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
Useful pages in dealing with contentious topics (which is
On Jan 21, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
David Gerard wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
Take a look at the lovely new page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice
Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it.
