Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >> Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort >>

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort

RE: AOO -> LO or MS O

] Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 06:54 To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: AOO -> LO or MS O On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open > Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/03/2015 04:11 AM, Tony Stevenson wrote: > > This is an interesting read: > > http://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2015/sep/03/switch-openoffice-libreoffice-or-microsoft-office?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech > > > > > > Many

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

> On 03 Sep 15, at 12:33, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > > On 09/03/2015 07:22 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: >> >>> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: "After LibreOffice came

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

public by digital means. > Substitutability has been promoted to those organizations as a safeguard > for adoption of these products. > > > -Original Message----- > From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2015 06:54 > To: dev@openoffice.apa

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

elivery of services and coordination with the public by digital means. >> Substitutability has been promoted to those organizations as a safeguard >> for adoption of these products. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] &g

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >> >> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >> Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort >> >>

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

> Interesting yet not quite accurate. I never made any claims to it's accuracy. I was hoping someone would do exactly what Rich suggested, but preferably without the prompting that Rich afforded the group. The reason for sending it to this list was to see the reaction it got, and how that

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

On 09/03/2015 07:22 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > >> On 03 Sep 15, at 09:54, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >>> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of >>> Oracle Open Office before deciding that the

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

> On 03 Sep 15, at 15:13, Rob Weir wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: >>> >>> "After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open >>> Office before

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

On Thursday, September 3, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote: > > > On 03 Sep 15, at 15:13, Rob Weir > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Rich Bowen > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 09/03/2015 08:33 AM,

Re: AOO -> LO or MS O

"After LibreOffice came out, Oracle released one version of Oracle Open Office before deciding that the project wasn’t worth the effort . It laid off the programmers and gave the code

RE: AOO -> LO or MS O

Thursday, September 3, 2015 12:06 To: dev <dev@openoffice.apache.org>; Dennis Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> Subject: Re: AOO -> LO or MS O 2015-09-03 17:48 GMT+02:00 Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org>: > PS: On the interoperable-use challenge lurking in the a