Re: Buildbots

Hi Gavin, On 11/16/21 7:15 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote: Hi Matthias, On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:32 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Gavin, Am 16.11.21 um 09:37 schrieb Gavin McDonald: Hi All. Ok so I am making progress. The nightly x64 build is running fine. as are the rat builds. I'll get the

Re: Buildbots

Hi Matthias, On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:32 PM Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Gavin, > > Am 16.11.21 um 09:37 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > > Hi All. > > > > Ok so I am making progress. > > > > The nightly x64 build is running fine. as are the rat builds. > > I'll get the 41 branch added today - should

Re: Buildbots

Hi Gavin, Am 16.11.21 um 09:37 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > Hi All. > > Ok so I am making progress. > > The nightly x64 build is running fine. as are the rat builds. > I'll get the 41 branch added today - should we also do a 42 branch build? Thanks! It would be ideal to have all branches

Re: Buildbots

Hi All. Ok so I am making progress. The nightly x64 build is running fine. as are the rat builds. I'll get the 41 branch added today - should we also do a 42 branch build? As for the win10 builds I am working on those now. I am at a stage in the win10 build where it wants dlls and exe files

Re: Buildbots

Hi Gavin, On 11/14/21 2:16 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: Hi All, As the current Buildbots arent really working, nodes offline etc, I thought this would be the best time to migrate your builds over to our newer replacement buildbot 3.2 over at ci2.apache.org . I'll do my best to get them all

Re: Buildbots

Am 09.11.19 um 09:28 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Just FYI, the Windows bots are building again... https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html We are now working on the Linux machines... that's great news. Thanks for that. :-) Marcus

Re: Buildbots

Great! Am 9. November 2019 09:28:40 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi all, > >Just FYI, the Windows bots are building again... > >https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds.html > >We are now working on the Linux machines... > >Regards, > >   Matthias

Re: Buildbots page

Jim Jagielski wrote: How can I upload my macOS build there?? I've answered you here: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/05d175d207b2bdc1ed83c8c4884630e91663a953daf12fe8612e98c5@%3Cdev.openoffice.apache.org%3E and here:

Re: Buildbots page

Hi Jim, This page links only to the output area of our buildbots. I doubt that we can upload there... As Andrea stated in another mail: "So we've traditionally hosted the normal dev builds (before RC) on people.apache.org; but Infra decided to replace it with home.apache.org and to make it

Re: Buildbots page

How can I upload my macOS build there?? > On Apr 1, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > If no one has objections I would make : > > https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds-test.html > > live tomorrow and ask Infra to remove the script, page and

Re: Buildbots page

Hi, "All this work" took me about 30 minutes... ;-) But the script has not been updated for years and the page is totally outdated. Feel free to maintain it. Regards, Matthias Am 02.04.2017 um 02:58 schrieb Gavin McDonald: > I have no idea why you have been doing all this work, the old

Re: Buildbots page

I have no idea why you have been doing all this work, the old scripts have been working fine and can be updated in svn for the template parts and git for the sh script. Gav… > On 2 Apr 2017, at 6:52 am, Matthias Seidel wrote: > > If no one has objections I would

Re: Buildbots page

If no one has objections I would make : https://www.openoffice.org/download/devbuilds-test.html live tomorrow and ask Infra to remove the script, page and artefacts of: https://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/index.html Regards, Matthias FYI: I changed the schedule of the snapshot builds

Re: Buildbots page

Am 28.03.2017 um 01:55 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > It might have changed... Indeed (from: https://svn.apache.org/repos//infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/README_SCRIPTS.txt): Index generation scripts Note: The shell scripts which

Re: Buildbots page

It might have changed... On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Matthias Seidel < matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Thanks you for the link, but in: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/ > aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/ > > I can

Re: Buildbots page

Hi Damjan, Thanks you for the link, but in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/ I can only find header, footer and CSS but no script? Regards, Matthias Am 27.03.2017 um 18:25 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > It's

Re: Buildbots page

It's generated from: https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/buildbot/aegis/buildmaster/master1/public_html/projects/openoffice/create-ooo-snapshots-index.sh Regards Damjan On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:58 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hello all! > > Is there

Re: Buildbots are working again

Hi Peter If trunk is stable and I develop in branches, then buildbots will either be equally broken as they will break on the branches, or they will build trunk and be stable but useless to me. I think your biggest problem is building on Arch Linux, and I am downloading it now to try it myself.

Re: Buildbots are working again

Hi all, I am a bit unhappy with this approach. It basicly blocks all other efforts on the code. Ok. I am still struggeling with the build, but since I started to change code itself I actually making progress. I currently do not know where to commit those changes, so I can check on different

Re: Buildbots are working again

Yes, the last problem was that main/curl needed adding to RepositoryExternal.mk. I've committed a fix and am testing it on the FreeBSD bot now. The bots will be quite unstable going forward, as I am actively porting modules to gbuild. They help me a lot to test different platforms quickly, with

Re: Buildbots are working again

Hi Damjan, Last night the linux64-41x buildbot (and maybe others) failed. Last successful build was 31.12.2016. Do you have any idea? Regards, Matthias Am 26.12.2016 um 19:45 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: > Hi > > All the buildbots are successfully building now. > > The FreeBSD bot was fixed by

Re: Buildbots are working again

Thanks a lot Damjan. Sounds really great. I will update my repository and try to build open office again. Maybe it works for me. :) All the best Peter Damjan Jovanovic schrieb am Mo., 26. Dez. 2016, 19:46: > Hi > > All the buildbots are successfully building now. > > The

Re: Buildbots update

On 24 Jul, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 22/07/2016 Don Lewis wrote: >> On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> I've progressed much further > > Thanks Damjan for the (as usual) great progress. > >>> Buildbots >>> should immediately fail the build if ./bootstrap fails >> Yes, there is no sense in

Re: Buildbots update

On 24 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > >> On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> > I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, >> > openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and >> >

Re: Buildbots update

On 22/07/2016 Don Lewis wrote: On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I've progressed much further Thanks Damjan for the (as usual) great progress. Buildbots should immediately fail the build if ./bootstrap fails Yes, there is no sense in continuing if bootstrap fails Yes, sure. 5 hours is

Re: Buildbots update

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, > > openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and > > openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while >

Re: Buildbots update

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, > openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and > openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot > is only

Re: Buildbots update

On 22 Jul, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, > openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and > openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot > is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge issues. I've

Re: Buildbots update

Am 07/22/2016 09:09 AM, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge

Re: Buildbots update

On 7/22/2016 12:09 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: ... I'll experiment a lot more over the weekend, but right now I think the problem could be that the buildbot runs VSVARS.BAT to set up the Visual Studio environment, which (presumably) contains the evil DEVENV that break the build and locks files

Re: Buildbots update

I've progressed much further, and openoffice-fbsd-nightly, openoffice-linux32-nightly, openoffice-linux64-nightly, and openoffice-linux64-rat are now building, while openoffice-linux32-snapshot is only temporarily breaking due to SourceForge issues. I've also made some interesting discoveries

Re: Buildbots update

On 07/19/2016 11:17 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > I contacted Infra on HipChat and asked them to fix the buildbots I could > find with the Perl LWP::Protocol::https problem (aoo-w7snap, > openoffice-fbsd-nightly, and openoffice-linux32-nightly) or give me access > to do it myself, and

Re: Buildbots are back

Nice! Thanks to everyone involved. The FreeBSD buildbot appears to need the same treatment BTW. Pedro. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Buildbots are back

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > As you may have noticed, our buildbots are back. We now have development > builds available. > > A missing package needed to be installed by Infra on the buildbots and > they started installing it on the various VMs.

Re: Buildbots update

Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I've asked infra to get LWP::Protocol::https installed on all the buildbots and they're working on it. Thanks for debugging, this will hopefully solve it. So indeed the issue is on the buildbots side but it was related to SourceForge now enforcing HTTPS downloads. I

Re: Buildbots update

Steps 1-4 first delete the "source" directory, do a fresh SVN checkout (not update) into "source", delete the "build" directory, and copy "source" to "build". The build is then run in "build". This was the only robust way to get it working and fix all the errors and timeouts that were happening

Re: Buildbots update

[top posting] hmmm...maybe I've figured out the problem? using Linux-32 nightly as the example. Take a look at the PWD variable in this listing: https://ci.apache.org/builders/openoffice-linux32-nightly/builds/191/steps/configure/logs/stdio and the corresponding TARFILE_LOCATION (which is

Re: Buildbots update

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: > >> On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> it seems that buildbots are having issues with network in general >>> >> Do we have any additional news on the download failures

Re: Buildbots update

Kay Schenk wrote: On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: it seems that buildbots are having issues with network in general Do we have any additional news on the download failures specifically from the buildbots to SourceForge downloads? Why SourceForge? Look at

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/13/2016 11:45 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> The buildbots are all failing to download 15 dependencies every night >> now. I think something is wrong with access to SourceForge :-(. > > Well, from what I see for example here >

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/12/2016 10:43 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> >> On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM,

Re: Buildbots update

Damjan Jovanovic wrote: The buildbots are all failing to download 15 dependencies every night now. I think something is wrong with access to SourceForge :-(. Well, from what I see for example here

Re: Buildbots update

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: All the *nix buildbots are

Re: Buildbots update

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> >> All the *nix buildbots are now green and should be building 100% reliably. > > YAY! > I jinxed it, many bots failed in ./bootstrap as they couldn't download

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> >>> All the *nix buildbots are now green and should be building 100% reliably. >> >> YAY! >> > > I jinxed it,

Re: Buildbots update

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:42 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 02/11/2016 09:30 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> >>> On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: All the *nix buildbots are

Re: Buildbots update

On 02/10/2016 09:41 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Most of the common problems with the buildbots have been fixed: > * The Windows buildbots were failing to determine the SVN revision > being built, showing "UNKNOWN". This was fixed by running the "svn > info" command under Cygwin, as the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 18 November 2013 08:56, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. first of all thanks for the summarized update * We've received assurances that the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. first of all thanks for the summarized update * We've received assurances that

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 11/15/13 6:54 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. first of all thanks for the summarized update * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story short, the current mac hardware is a

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

School for the week is over. Let me just configure this SVN repo thing (I use Git, sorry) and the whole environment. A couple of questions - Am I right to presume that I need the 4 GB trunk to start building? - What set of details do you guys need from me? On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:01

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Glenn Harvey Liwanag glennharveyliwa...@gmail.com wrote: I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to know first the average build time and the instructions to

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story short, the current mac hardware is a bit long in the tooth and we would kill everything on it if we added our builds to the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

[top posting] Thank you for this update! :) On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Andrew Rist andrew.r...@oracle.com wrote: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Really promizing and great news. Thanks for the detailed update. Marcus Am 11/15/2013 06:54 PM, schrieb Andrew Rist: I wanted to give an update on the buildbots, as this is a question that keeps coming up. * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. Long story short, the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

Andrew Rist wrote: * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ... We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving us our own environment that can be set up for AOO. The machine should be ordered by the

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

On 15 November 2013 20:52, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote: Andrew Rist wrote: * We've received assurances that the Mac buildbot is coming. ... We are waiting for real hardware in the form of a Mac Pro which will enable us to have multiple virtualized mac bots, giving us our own

Re: buildbots -- Linux and MacOSX

I can try building the thing on my Mac OS X if that's what you're looking for. It's my only computer right now and I use it for school so I have to know first the average build time and the instructions to get the whole thing done without academics interfering with the work. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013