Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-21 Thread Matthias Seidel
I installed the german DEB on Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit) So far everything is working as expected... regards Matthias Am 21.09.2016 um 01:04 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 17/09/2016 Mechtilde wrote: >> Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde: >>> is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-20 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 17/09/2016 Mechtilde wrote: Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde: is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available? I forgot: my system is Debian 64-bit Buildbots aside (they were not working last time I checked), you can use the 4.1.3-dev builds at

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-16 Thread Mechtilde
Am 17.09.2016 um 07:25 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available? I forgot: my system is Debian 64-bit > > Regards > > Mechtilde > > Am 15.09.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: >> In response to truckman; >>> >>> On 14 Sep, Patricia

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-16 Thread Mechtilde
Hello, is there a first "nightly build for version 4.1.3 available? Regards Mechtilde Am 15.09.2016 um 17:15 schrieb Pedro Giffuni: > In response to truckman; >> >> On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >>> Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? >>> >>> 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-15 Thread Pedro Giffuni
In response to truckman; > On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open to arguments. Have all of the necessary

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Don Lewis
On 14 Sep, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? > > 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut > off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but > I'm open to arguments. Have all of the necessary download site

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
Good argument. I've granted it 4.1.3 release blocker. On 9/14/2016 10:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one stops configure in its tracks. On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
All other OSX 10.11 "blockers" can be worked around by adding some depedencies (like openssl...) but this one stops configure in its tracks. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > 4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just > has the

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
4.1.3 won't build on 10.11 w/o this since the Xcode provided just has the 10.11 SDX and configure doesn't see it and so the configure process dies. You have to hand edit configure to push thru. > On Sep 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Should this go in 4.1.3 or

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Patricia Shanahan
Should this go in 4.1.3 or in 4.1.4? 4.1.3 will not be able to move on to building and testing unless we cut off additions at some point. I think that point has already passed, but I'm open to arguments. On 9/14/2016 9:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Didn't see this addressed so opened a new

Re: Last call for 4.1.3 patches

2016-09-14 Thread Jim Jagielski
Didn't see this addressed so opened a new blocker: https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127113 > On Sep 13, 2016, at 6:26 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > Please make sure all patches for 4.1.3 are checked in to the AOO413 branch. > >