Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

If you read through the LO bug report, you'll see that there are many patches for this bug, affecting multiple modules. Why? The historical files that are valid but have the wrong checksum due to having been written by the broken [OO.org-derivative] implementations when they were created, will

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Hi Brane, This is a very nice Idea. Maybe even beyond the immediate idea on fixing the SHA implementation. Thanks a lot for this Idea. All the Best Peter On 26.07.19 12:36, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 25.07.2019 00:43, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> >> I would like to ask if I or any

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

OT: Welcome back Rafael! On 25.07.19 22:57, Raphael Bircher wrote: > If the code is released from the original author under Apache License > v2.0 then we can include it, else we have to write our own solution > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:54 PM Keith N. McKenna > wrote: >> On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM,

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

On 25.07.2019 00:43, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > > I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team > can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue > under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without > more work then

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

OT: Hi, Raphael - wb Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

If the code is released from the original author under Apache License v2.0 then we can include it, else we have to write our own solution On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 9:54 PM Keith N. McKenna wrote: > > On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked.

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

On 7/25/2019 1:26 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked. No one should say that we > did not try it this way. > > Am 25. Juli 2019 09:38:28 MESZ schrieb Bidouille : >> >> >> - Mail original - >>> I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

Call me naive. I wanted to have the question asked. No one should say that we did not try it this way. Am 25. Juli 2019 09:38:28 MESZ schrieb Bidouille : > > >- Mail original - >> I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to license it also >> under the ALv2 we cannot commit it to

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

- Mail original - > I believe that unless the LO developer agrees to license it also > under the ALv2 we cannot commit it to our code base. +1 The author is Michael Stahl, employed at CIB GmbH. This company is copyleft addicted and LibO side only.

Re: SHA1/MD5 in sal/rtl/source/digest.c patch license able for OO

On 7/24/2019 6:43 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hello all, > > > I would like to ask if I or any other from OpenOffice Development team > can port the patch from LibreOffice to OpenOffice to fix this Issue > under the APL2 License, so the Issue can be fixed in OpenOffice without > more work then