Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-23 Thread Hagar Delest
OK, works fine now. Maybe a cache issue on my side. Hagar Le 23/07/2013 10:48, Hagar Delest a écrit : I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still leads to 3.4.1. Hagar Le 23/07/2013

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/23/2013 10:48 AM, schrieb Hagar Delest: I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still leads to 3.4.1. I've fixed the defaults on SourceForge while the day. Pssst, don't tell my boss.

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-23 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this?

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-23 Thread Kay Schenk
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default. Announce == go live with news on

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. This was already planned to do. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download

Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Rob Weir
Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default. Announce == go live with news on front page, header announcement on every page (branding.mdtext),

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download web

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. This was already planned to do.

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. This was already planned to do.

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html Only then I will publish to the live server. Marcus Am 07/22/2013 07:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM,

RE: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Manuel del Valle
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Valle m...@outlook.com wrote: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 08:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Vallem...@outlook.com wrote: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 08:24 PM, schrieb Manuel del Valle: Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200 From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Rob Weir
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The small print under the download box has two lines for

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when nothing else comes in we should be ready to go live

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 10:03 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote: Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Donald Whytock
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: 2) What should the legacy link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still legacy? If so, what is 3.4.1? We might need to reword and restructure that destination page, but I think it is OK

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Donald Whytock: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: 2) What should the legacy link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still legacy? If so, what is 3.4.1? We might need to reword and

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html The last hints are fixed. So, when

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote: Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, I've updated the DL webpages. After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update our download

Re: Release coordination proposal

2013-07-22 Thread Kay Schenk
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: Can we do something like this? Two stage: release and announce. Release