OK, works fine now. Maybe a cache issue on my side.
Hagar
Le 23/07/2013 10:48, Hagar Delest a écrit :
I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been
released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge still
leads to 3.4.1.
Hagar
Le 23/07/2013
Am 07/23/2013 10:48 AM, schrieb Hagar Delest:
I don't understand: the banner on the AOO website says that 4.0 has been
released but there is no download link. Going manually to Sourceforge
still leads to 3.4.1.
I've fixed the defaults on SourceForge while the day.
Pssst, don't tell my boss.
Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/23/2013 02:46 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenkkay.sch...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default.
Announce == go live with news on
Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
This was already planned to do.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download web page to serve 4.0 files by default.
Announce == go live with news on front page, header announcement on
every page (branding.mdtext),
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download web
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
This was already planned to do.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 05:49 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
This was already planned to do.
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
Only then I will publish to the live server.
Marcus
Am 07/22/2013 07:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:18 AM,
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200
From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/index.htmlhttp://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Valle m...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200
From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I
Am 07/22/2013 08:30 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Manuel del Vallem...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200
From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal
OK, I've updated the DL webpages
Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
Am 07/22/2013 08:24 PM, schrieb Manuel del Valle:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:00:21 +0200
From: marcus.m...@wtnet.de
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release coordination proposal
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready
Am 07/22/2013 09:17 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:28 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
The small print under the download box has two lines for
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
The last hints are fixed. So, when nothing else comes in we should be
ready to go live
Am 07/22/2013 10:03 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Il 22/07/2013 Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
The last hints are fixed. So, when
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
2) What should the legacy link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still legacy?
If so, what is 3.4.1? We might need to reword and restructure that
destination page, but I think it is OK
Am 07/22/2013 11:40 PM, schrieb Donald Whytock:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 09:45 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
2) What should the legacy link go to now? Is 3.3.0 still legacy?
If so, what is 3.4.1? We might need to reword and
Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/index.html
The last hints are fixed. So, when
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 07/22/2013 09:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 07/22/2013 08:00 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
OK, I've updated the DL webpages.
After fixing some broken links, I think it's OK and ready for a review:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
Release == put the 4.0 files into production on SourceForge, update
our download
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Can we do something like this?
Two stage: release and announce.
Release
29 matches
Mail list logo