Patricia Shanahan wrote:
My view on this is that we should check in the changes for 4.1.3, freeze
its code, and then create AOO414 as a copy of AOO413.
Sure, this will work too. Then when you really release 4.1.3 with any
last-minute fixes, a single "svn merge" command will update the AOO414
On 9/10/2016 3:10 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm going to wait a few hours to see if someone claims to depend on us
not changing the branch. Absent a specific issue, I plan to create a
4.1.3 branch, and expect the, not yet selected, 4.1.4 Release Manager to
create a
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I'm going to wait a few hours to see if someone claims to depend on us
not changing the branch. Absent a specific issue, I plan to create a
4.1.3 branch, and expect the, not yet selected, 4.1.4 Release Manager to
create a branch for it.
OK. After all, I would assume
Patricia Shanahan wrote:
On 9/10/2016 12:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
only code with a bug and release blocker flag approved by the Release
Manager can be checked in that branch; that is: if you want to include
changes in the AOO413 branch:
1) open a bug
2) request releaser blocker
> On 11 Sep 2016, at 7:13 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> On 9/10/2016 12:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>>> Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner
>>> or later, with
On 9/10/2016 12:55 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner
or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but
with more clarity for those
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:40:48AM +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner
> or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but
> with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a release last
>
Am 09/08/2016 03:09 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
On 9/8/2016 6:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3
sooner or later, with some duplication of work with
On 9/8/2016 6:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner or
later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but with more
clarity for those
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3 sooner
> or later, with some duplication of work with respect to 4.1.2-patch1 but with
> more clarity for those who couldn't see that we made a
On 09/07/2016 06:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3
sooner or later, with some duplication of work with respect to
4.1.2-patch1 but with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we
made a release last month.
I'll thus
Recent events make it clear we will have to release OpenOffice 4.1.3
sooner or later, with some duplication of work with respect to
4.1.2-patch1 but with more clarity for those who couldn't see that we
made a release last month.
I'll thus consider the AOO410 branch to be open again for the
12 matches
Mail list logo