Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-20 Thread John D'Orazio
I can confirm that opening Open Office today, without going into Tools or other, I automatically received after about a minute the notification of the new update available for version 4.1.3. On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Marcus wrote: > >> You

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-18 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Marcus wrote: You may want to review the text as there are some typos in the last sentence. ;-) Thanks, there were some copy/paste issues. Keith already fixed the text a bit, and I've now edited it again. By the way, translators might want to update their localized version (they should have

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-17 Thread Marcus
Am 10/17/2016 11:16 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ... The change to the update script is usually done several days

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-17 Thread Andrea Pescetti
On 15/10/2016 Marcus wrote: Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" ... The change to the update script is usually done several days after... I plan to update script data during the

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-15 Thread Marcus
Am 10/14/2016 09:01 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-14 Thread Pedro
On 14-10-2016 08:01, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-14 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Keith N. McKenna wrote: Pedro wrote: Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" I have added the your comment to the cwiki document. The change to the update script is usually done several days after the formal Release announcement so as to minimize the load on the mirrors.

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Pedro wrote: > One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that > current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available. > Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" > > Thank you all for keeping the project alive. I have added the your comment

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Pedro
One last step needed: update the version number somewhere so that current OpenOffice users are warned that a new version is available. Currently version 4.1.2 still reports that it "is up to date" Thank you all for keeping the project alive. On 12/10/2016 22:49, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed >> all but my basic privileges. > > Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is > enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Keith N. McKenna wrote: Can you restore my space admin privileges on the Cwiki. I had removed all but my basic privileges. Sure! I've now given you all permissions I could assign. I hope this is enough; if not, we must contact Infra (but it seems that I could assign the space admin

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Keith N. McKenna
Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Patricia Shanahan wrote: I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but given my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first. > > You can now

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 6:05 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > > On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote: >> Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: >>> First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a >>> conventional, co-located project I'd like to take

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-13 Thread Andrea Pescetti
Patricia Shanahan wrote: I'm thinking of creating "How to cook a release" as a child page under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Releases, but given my inability to delete pages I would like to get opinions first. You can now delete pages. and in general, if people do not

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-12 Thread Patricia Shanahan
On 10/12/2016 2:55 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a drink after work. Now back to work :-) At this moment, I hope

Re: Writing up the release process

2016-10-12 Thread Marcus
Am 10/12/2016 11:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan: First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a drink after work. Now back to work :-) At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did,

Writing up the release process

2016-10-12 Thread Patricia Shanahan
First, congratulations to everyone on releasing 4.1.3. If this were a conventional, co-located project I'd like to take you all out for a drink after work. Now back to work :-) At this moment, I hope everyone remembers exactly what they did, what karma and tools they used, to make the